The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Merging Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Identity Personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors
Abstract
Abstract The current study attempted to understand factors influencing pro-environmental behaviors with Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Value Identity Personal norm model (VIP) by proposing a new model. 16 hypotheses were tested using a total of 340 science teachers in several cities in central anatolia region in Turkey. Scales obtained from previous studies included eight psychological variables to measure antecedents of pro-environmental behaviors. Structural equation modeling revealed that the proposed model has acceptable fit data and was determined for hypothesis testing. The results of the data analysis showed that the biospheric values have significant influence on TPB constructs. In addition, attitude and perceived behavioral control had a direct influence on pro-environmental behavioral intentions which encourage active engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, while subjective norm had no direct effect on pro-environmental behavioral intentions. Lastly, considering VIP constructs, biospheric values and environmental self-identity had a direct influence on personal norm which in turn affected pro-environmental behaviors. Results of indirect relationship between constructs showed that attitude, perceived behavioral control, biospheric values and environmental self-identity had indirect influence on pro-environmental behaviors, while the indirect relationship between subjective norm and behaviors was insignificant. Consequently, 14 out of 16 hypotheses within the model that merged the TPB and the VIP were statistically supported in determining antecedents of pro-environmental behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,867
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
Cited by
Ateş, H. (2021) · Ecology of Food and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/03670244.2020.1865339 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ateş, H.
- Venue
- Sustainable Production and Consumption
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 169-180
- ISSN
- 2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3043805694
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 38.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Merging Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Identity Personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.006
- The paper
- Ateş, H. (2020). Merging Theory of Planned Behavior and Value Identity Personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
