The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards environmental sustainability: Exploring the nexus among ISO 14001, governance indicators and green economy in Pakistan
Abstract
Abstract The green growth paradigm has gained much attention in the last decade. Green growth not only protects the environment and human beings but also serves as a substitute for scarce natural assets. Governance institutions develop laws and policies for all industries in a country and are directly responsible for natural resource exploration and environmental protection or destruction. Pakistan is the fifth most vulnerable country to environmental hazards in the world. To address this issue, this study is the first to analyze the relations among governance indicators, ISO 14001 and green growth in Pakistan by using time-series data from 2000 to 2017. The study utilized advanced mathematical Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) models, namely, absolute grey relational grade (GRG), Deng's GRG, and Second Synthetic Degree of Grey Incidence Analysis (SSGIG) models, to capture the relations among the studied variables. The main results revealed that ISO 14001, with the highest GRA values of 0.8-0.9, proved to be effective in channeling green growth. Among all governance indicators related to green growth, the rule of law with the highest maximin criterion value of 0.644 was found to play a key role for Pakistan. The study findings provide insights into how good governance can contribute to accomplishing the objectives of environmental sustainability. They can also help legislators and organizations understand the importance of ISO 14001 certification to promote sustainable practices across sectors in Pakistan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011) · Hague Journal on the Rule of Law · doi:10.1017/s1876404511200046 · Cited by 5,621
Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200717230 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3219 · Cited by 452
Self-citationTesting the fluctuations of oil resource price volatility: A hurdle for economic recovery
Xiuzhen, X., Zheng, W., & Umair, M. (2022) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102982 · Cited by 407
Qazi, H., Alam, S., & Phulpoto, A. (2023) · Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.52131/pjhss.2023.1103.0646 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Abid, N., Ikram, M., Wu, J., & Ferasso, M.
- Venue
- Sustainable Production and Consumption
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 653-666
- ISSN
- 2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121668730
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards environmental sustainability: Exploring the nexus among ISO 14001, governance indicators and green economy in Pakistan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.024
- The paper
- Abid, N., Ikram, M., Wu, J., & Ferasso, M. (2021). Towards environmental sustainability: Exploring the nexus among ISO 14001, governance indicators and green economy in Pakistan. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.