Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 758

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 227 of the 227 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recognising realistic emotions and affect in speech: State of the art and lessons learnt from the first challenge

Open access
Schuller, Björn, Batliner, Anton, Steidl, Stefan, Seppi, Dino·2011·Speech Communication
DOI 10.1016/j.specom.2011.01.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.specom.2011.01.011

Cites

227 of 227 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 227 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Al-Hames, M., Rigoll, G., 2006. Reduced complexity and scaling for asynchronous HMMs in a bimodal input fusion application. In: Proc. ICASSP, Toulouse, France, pp. 757–760. · doi:10.1109/icassp.2006.1661386
  2. Armstrong, 2007, Significance tests harm progress in forecasting, Internat. J. Forecast., 23, 321, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.03.004 · DOI
  3. Batliner, A., Steidl, S., Schuller, B., Seppi, D., Vogt, T., Devillers, L., Vidrascu, L., Amir, N., Kessous, L., Aharonson, V., 2007. The impact of F0 extraction errors on the classification of prominence and emotion. In: Proc. ICPhS, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp. 2201–2204.
  4. Batliner, A., Fischer, K., Huber, R., Spilker, J., Nöth, E., 2000. Desperately seeking emotions: actors, wizards, and human beings. In: Proc. ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion, Newcastle, Northern Ireland, pp. 195–200.
  5. Batliner, A., Hacker, C., Steidl, S., Nöth, E., Haas, J., 2004. From emotion to interaction: lessons from real human–machine-dialogues. In: Proc. Tutorial and Research Workshop on Affective Dialogue Systems, Kloster Irsee, Germany, pp. 1–12. · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24842-2_1
  6. Batliner, A., Steidl, S., Nöth, E., 2007a. Laryngealizations and emotions: How many Babushkas? In: Proc. Internat. Workshop on Paralinguistic Speech – between Models and Data (ParaLing’07), Saarbrücken, Germany, pp. 17–22.
  7. Batliner, A., Schuller, B., Schaeffler, S., Steidl, S., 2008a. Mothers, adults, children, pets — towards the acoustics of intimacy. In: Proc. ICASSP 2008, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 4497–4500. · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518655
  8. Boda, P.P., 2004. Multimodal integration in a wider sense. In: Proc. COLING 2004 Satellite Workshop on Robust and Adaptive Information Processing for Mobile Speech Interfaces, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 22–30.
  9. Campbell, N., Kashioka, H., Ohara, R., 2005. No laughing matter. In: Proc. Interspeech, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 465–468. · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2005-317
  10. Ding, H., Qian, B., Li, Y., Tang, Z., 2006. A method combining lpc-based cepstrum and harmonic product spectrum for pitch detection. In: Proc. 2006 Internat. Conf. on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia, IEEE, pp. 537–540.
  11. Elliott, C., 1992. The affective reasoner: a process model of emotions in a multi-agent system. Ph.D. Thesis, Dissertation, Northwestern University.
  12. Fattah, S.A., Zhu, W.P., Ahmad, M.O., 2008. A cepstral domain algorithm for formant frequency estimation from noise-corrupted speech. In: Internat. Conf. on Neural Networks and Signal Processing 2008, Zhenjiang, China, pp. 114–119. · doi:10.1109/icnnsp.2008.4590321
  13. Fei, Z., Huang, X., Wu, L., 2006. Mining the relation between sentiment expression and target using dependency of words. In: Proc. 20th Pacific Asia Conf. on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC20), Wuhan, China, pp. 257–264.
  14. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D., 2004. Predicting emotion in spoken dialogue fromm multiple knowledge sources. In: Proc. Human Language Technology Conf. of the North American Chap. of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, Boston, MA, USA, no pagination.
  15. Goertzel, B., Silverman, K., Hartley, C., Bugaj, S., Ross, M., 2000. The baby webmind project. In: Proc. Annual Conf. of The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB), no pagination.
  16. Hirschberg, J., Liscombe, J., Venditti, J., 2003. Experiments in emotional speech. In: Proc. ISCA and IEEE Workshop on Spontaneous Speech Processing and Recognition, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1–7.
  17. Hui, L., Dai, B.-Q., Wei, L., 2006. A pitch detection algorithm based on amdf and acf. In: Proc. ICASSP, Toulouse, France, p. I.
  18. Inanoglu, Z., Caneel, R., 2005. Emotive alert: HMM-based emotion detection in voicemail messages. In: Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 251–253. · doi:10.1145/1040830.1040885
  19. Kim, E., Hyun, K., Kim, S., Kwak, Y., 2007. Emotion interactive robot focus on speaker independently emotion recognition. In: Proc. IEEE/ASME Internat. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 1–6. · doi:10.1109/aim.2007.4412451
  20. Laskowski, K., 2009. Contrasting emotion-bearing laughter types in multiparticipant vocal activity detection for meetings. In: Proc. ICASSP, IEEE, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 4765–4768. · doi:10.1109/icassp.2009.4960696
  21. Nose, T., Kato, Y., Kobayashi, T., 2007. Style estimation of speech based on multiple regression hidden semi-markov model. In: Proc. Interspeech, Antwerp, Belgium, pp. 2285–2288. · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2007-620
  22. Schiel, F., 1999. Automatic phonetic transcription of non-prompted speech. In: Proc. ICPhS, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 607–610.
  23. Schröder, M., Pirker, H., Lamolle, M., 2006. First suggestions for an emotion annotation and representation language. In: Devillers, L., Martin, J.-C., Cowie, R., Douglas-Cowie, E., Batliner, A. (Eds.), Proc. Satellite Workshop of LREC 2006 on Corpora for Research on Emotion and Affect, Genoa, Italy, pp. 88–92.
  24. Schuller, B., Köhler, N., Müller, R., Rigoll, G., 2006b. Recognition of interest in human conversational speech. In: Proc. Interspeech, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 793–796. · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2006-273
  25. Seppi, D., Gerosa, M., Schuller, B., Batliner, A., Steidl, S., 2008b. Detecting problems in spoken child–computer interaction. In: Proc. 1st Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction, Chania, Greece, no pagination.
  26. Shaver, 1992, Cross-cultural similarities and differences in emotion and its representation: a prototype approach, Emotion, 175
  27. Sood, S., Krishnamurthy, A., 2004. A robust on-the-fly pitch (otfp) estimation algorithm. In: Proc. 12th Annual ACM Internat. Conf. on Multimedia (MULTIMEDIA ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 280–283. · doi:10.1145/1027527.1027591
  28. Steidl, S., Ruff, C., Batliner, A., Nöth, E., Haas, J., 2004. Looking at the last two turns, I’d say this dialogue is doomed — measuring dialogue success. In: Sojka, P., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (Eds.), 7th Internat. Conf. on Text, Speech and Dialogue, TSD 2004, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 629–636. · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30120-2_79
  29. Steidl, S., Batliner, A., Nöth, E., Hornegger, A., 2008. Quantification of segmentation and fo errors and their effect on emotion recognition. In: 11th Internat. Conf. on Text, Speech and Dialogue, TSD 2008, pp. 525–534. · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87391-4_67
  30. Steidl, S., 2009. Automatic classification of emotion-related user states in spontaneous children’s speech. Logos Verlag, Berlin, Germany, (Ph.D. Thesis, FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg).
  31. Takahashi, K., 2004. Remarks on emotion recognition from bio-potential signals. In: Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. on Autonomous Robots and Agents, pp. 186–191.
  32. Ververidis, D., Kotropoulos, C., 2003. A review of emotional speech databases. In: PCI 2003, 9th Panhellenic Conf. on Informatics, November 1–23, 2003, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 560–574.
  33. Ververidis, D., Kotropoulos, C., 2006. Fast sequential floating forward selection applied to emotional speech features estimated on DES and SUSAS data collection. In: Proc. European Signal Processing Conf. (EUSIPCO 2006), Florence, Italy, no pagination.
  34. Vidrascu, L., Devillers, L., 2007. Five emotion classes in real-world call center data: the use of various types of paralinguistic features. In: Proc. PARALING07, pp. 11–16.
  35. Wu, S., Falk, T., Chan, W.-Y., 2008b. Long-term spectro-temporal information for improved automatic speech emotion classification. In: Proc. INTERSPEECH, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 638–641. · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2008-201
  36. Young, S., Evermann, G., Gales, M., Hain, T., D.Kershaw, Liu, X., Moore, G., Odell, J., Ollason, D., Povey, D., Valtchev, V., Woodland, P., 2006. The HTK Book, for htk version 3.4 Edition, Cambridge University Engineering Department.
  37. Zhe, X., Boucouvalas, A., 2002. Text-to-emotion engine for real time internet communication. In: Proc. Internat. Symp. on Communication Systems, Networks, and DSPs, Staffordshire University, pp. 164–168.

Cited by

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Schuller, B., Batliner, A., Steidl, S., & Seppi, D.
Venue
Speech Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
53
Issue
9-10
Pages
1062-1087
ISSN
0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.specom.2011.01.011
OpenAlex
W1987048275
Cited by
758
References
227
FWCI
77.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognising realistic emotions and affect in speech: State of the art and lessons learnt from the first challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.specom.2011.01.011
The paper
Schuller, B., Batliner, A., Steidl, S., & Seppi, D. (2011). Recognising realistic emotions and affect in speech: State of the art and lessons learnt from the first challenge. Speech Communication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2011.01.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.