Cited by 101Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Turn-taking, feedback and joint attention in situated human-robot interaction

Skantze, Gabriel, Hjalmarsson, Anna, Oertel, Catharine·2014·Speech Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.specom.2014.05.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both lexical choice and prosody in users' feedback are correlated with uncertainty.

    “In a study on human-robot interaction, Skantze et al. (2014) found that both the lexical choice and prosody in the users' feedback are correlated with uncertainty, and built a logistic regression classifier to combine these features.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Skantze et al., 2014

  • The authors show that gazing on the robot has a positive correlation with certainty.

    “The authors show that gazing on the robot has a positive correlation with certainty, i.e., that users look more at the robot when they are certain of the path they have just taken through the map.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Skantze et al., 2014

  • Skantze et al. (2014) showed that the performance of participants in the map task was connected to the user's utterance timing and prosody, and that this was more important than the linguistic contents of their speech.

    “They showed that the performance of participants in the map task was connected to the user's utterance timing and prosody, and that this was more important than the linguistic contents of their speech.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Skantze et al., 2014

  • Skantze et al. (2014) show that gaze can be used as a measure of uncertainty based on how it is used together with other feedback signals.

    “Skantze et al. (2014) show that gaze can be used as a measure of uncertainty based on how it is used together with other feedback signals.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Skantze et al., 2014

  • Skantze et al. (2014) showed that a physical robot with a face could use its gaze to elicit feedback by either looking at the task or the user.

    “This was elaborated upon by Skantze et al. (2014), who showed that a physical robot with a face could use its gaze to elicit feedback by either looking at the task (a map game) or the user.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Skantze et al. (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skantze, G., Hjalmarsson, A., & Oertel, C.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Skantze, Gabriel
Venue
Speech Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
65
Pages
50-66
ISSN
0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102759648
Cited by
101
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Speech Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
human-robot interaction, turn-taking, joint attention, gaze behavior, feedback, situated interaction, filled pauses, prosody, user uncertainty, face-to-face interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review