An integrated model using SWOT analysis and Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for evaluation occupational safety risks in life cycle of wind turbine
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The hesitant fuzzy AHP technique has proven to be as valid as the traditional AHP technique.
“This technique, which belongs to the group of methods extended with fuzzy numbers, has been frequently used in the literature and has proven to be as valid as the traditional AHP technique [17], [22], [23], [24], [48].”
From Trustworthiness Evaluation of Large Language Models Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The hesitant fuzzy AHP approach offers greater flexibility by accommodating expert hesitation in comparative evaluations and utilizing linguistic expressions instead of rigid numerical scales.
“This approach offers greater flexibility by accommodating expert hesitation in comparative evaluations and utilizing linguistic expressions instead of rigid numerical scales [17], [22], [23], [24].”
From Trustworthiness Evaluation of Large Language Models Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review
Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021) · Journal of Global Business Insights · doi:10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Trustworthiness Evaluation of Large Language Models Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Aksoy, M., Adem, A., & Dağdeviren, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3612568 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“While traditional MCDM techniques predominantly utilize crisp numbers, uncertainties, and data deficiencies necessitate the use of fuzzy MCDM approaches [17], [18].”
InfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Adem, A., Çolak, A., & Dağdeviren, M.
- Affiliations
- Gazi University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Adem, Aylin
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 106
- Pages
- 184-190
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789627017
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Safety Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
- Keywords
- wind turbines, SWOT analysis, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, expert opinion, risk prioritization, life-cycle risk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
