The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in safety, reliability, and risk assessments: A review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract System safety, reliability and risk analysis are important tasks that are performed throughout the system life-cycle to ensure the dependability of safety-critical systems. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) approaches are comprehensive, structured and logical methods widely used for this purpose. PRA approaches include, but not limited to, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Event Tree Analysis (ETA). Growing complexity of modern systems and their capability of behaving dynamically make it challenging for classical PRA techniques to analyse such systems accurately. For a comprehensive and accurate analysis of complex systems, different characteristics such as functional dependencies among components, temporal behaviour of systems, multiple failure modes/states for components/systems, and uncertainty in system behaviour and failure data are needed to be considered. Unfortunately, classical approaches are not capable of accounting for these aspects. Bayesian networks (BNs) have gained popularity in risk assessment applications due to their flexible structure and capability of incorporating most of the above mentioned aspects during analysis. Furthermore, BNs have the ability to perform diagnostic analysis. Petri Nets are another formal graphical and mathematical tool capable of modelling and analysing dynamic behaviour of systems. They are also increasingly used for system safety, reliability and risk evaluation. This paper presents a review of the applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in system safety, reliability and risk assessments. The review highlights the potential usefulness of the BN and PN based approaches over other classical approaches, and relative strengths and weaknesses in different practical application scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications
Murata, T. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.24143 · Cited by 10,606
Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches
Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-1994-7104 · Cited by 5,624
Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning
Murphy, K. P., & Russell, S. (2002) · Cited by 2,575
Accurate Approximations for Posterior Moments and Marginal Densities
Tierney, L., & Kadane, J. B. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478240 · Cited by 2,129
Adaptive Rejection Sampling for Gibbs Sampling
Gilks, W. R., & Wild, P. (1992) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2347565 · Cited by 1,642
Peterson, J. L. (1977) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/356698.356702 · Cited by 1,179
Performance Analysis Using Stochastic Petri Nets
Molloy (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1982.1676110 · Cited by 1,071
Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks
Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., & Ciancamerla, E. (2001) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(00)00077-6 · Cited by 933
Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges
Zio, E. (2009) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.06.002 · Cited by 884
Cited by
Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review
Saraygord Afshari, S., Enayatollahi, F., Xu, X., & Liang, X. (2022) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.108223 · Cited by 365
Artificial intelligence in safety-critical systems: a systematic review
Wang, Y., & Chung, S. H. (2022) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-07-2021-0419 · Cited by 96
Hybrid Intelligence Failure Analysis for Industry 4.0: A Literature Review and Future Prospective
Mokhtarzadeh, M., Rodríguez-Echeverría, J., Semanjski, I., & Gautama, S. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Kabir, S., & Papadopoulos, Y.
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 154-175
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911890521
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 132
- FWCI
- 28.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in safety, reliability, and risk assessments: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.009
- The paper
- Kabir, S., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2019). Applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in safety, reliability, and risk assessments: A review. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.