Disposable masks: Disinfection and sterilization for reuse, and non-certified manufacturing, in the face of shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is posing a huge global health threat. To deal with this problem, in addition to research and work in the medical field, the main health measures being taken in the workplace and at home involve the establishment of safety protocols, which include distance measures, hygiene and the use of personal protective equipment, such as masks, etc. The WHO still does not recommend the use of masks for the general population. However, their successful use in China, South Korea and the Czech Republic has encouraged their widespread use, and the shortage that already existed. This has caused that companies and individuals are looking at the best way to reuse them, and to manufacture, homemade or not, of non-certified masks. This paper is based on two objectives: to consult the scientific literature to identify the main strategies for disinfecting them, and to determine the effectiveness of non-certified disposable masks. A rapid review has been conducted in which the main publications and other information available online have been analyzed. Results showed that the most promising methods are those that use hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet radiation, moist heat, dry heat and ozone gas. Soapy water, alcohol, bleach immersion, ethylene oxide, ionizing radiation, microwave, high temperature, autoclave or steam are not fully recommended. Regarding the effectiveness of surgical masks compared to PPE, the former have been seen to be slightly less effective than PPE. As for other types of masks the effectiveness of homemade or non-certified masks is very low.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The KN95 is GB 2626-2019-approved with 95% filtration efficiency.
“The KN95 is GB 2626-2019-approved with 95% filtration efficiency. 44”
From Assessment of N95 and K95 respirator decontamination: fiber integrity, filtration efficiency, and dipole charge density (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Table 2 in “Effectiveness of the masks” lists KN95 under China’s GB 2626-2019 standard. The section specifies 95% filtration efficiency for N95, R95 and P95 under a North American standard, but does not explicitly give a filtration efficiency for KN95. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 281
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 3M, 2020a. Disinfection of Filtering Facepiece Respirators. M Science. Applied to life. Technical Bulletin. Available on 9th April 2020 at https://www.apsf.org/wp-content/uploads/news-updates/2020/Disinfection-of-M-Filtering-Facepiece-Respirators.pdf.
- 3M, 2020b. Decontamination Methods for M N95 Respirators. M Science. Applied to life. Technical Bulletin. Revision 4. Available on 20th of April 2020 at https://multimedia.m.com/mws/media/1824869O/decontamination-methods-for-m-n95-respirators-technical-bulletin.pdf.
- Mohapatra S. Sterilization and Disinfection in Essentials of Neuroanesthesia 2017 Academic Press 929 944
- UNE, 2020c. Press release. UNE Specification published to facilitate the manufacture of hygienic masks. Spanish Association for Standardisation-UNE. Available on 9th April 2020 at https://www.une.org/salainformaciondocumentos/NP%20UNE%200064-1%20mascarillas%20higienicas%20abr-20.pdf.
- UNE, 2020e. Press release. UNE Specification published to facilitate the manufacture of reusable hygienic masks. Available on 9th of April 2020 at https://www.une.org/la-asociacion/sala-de-informacion-une/noticias/especificacion-une-mascarillas.
- Authors
- Rubio-Romero, J. C., Pardo-Ferreira, M. D. C., Torrecilla-García, J. A., & Calero-Castro, S.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Málaga (ES)
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 129
- Pages
- 104830
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7218384
- OpenAlex
- W3024699894
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 44
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Safety Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (University of Málaga) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
- Keywords
- disposable face masks, mask reuse, mask disinfection, homemade masks, COVID-19 pandemic, personal protective equipment, surgical masks, hydrogen peroxide vapor, ultraviolet radiation, moist heat, ozone, mask shortage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review