Cited by 40Risk Perception and ManagementCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Determinants of safety-focused product purchasing in the United States at the beginning of the global COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Clemens, Kelly S., Matkovic, John, Faasse, Kate, Geers, Andrew L.·2020·Safety Science

Abstract

Public preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic was widely covered in the media due to its intensity and fast-pace. While some individuals prepared with personal safety supplies such as soap and hand sanitizer, many others did not purchase such preparatory products. There are many health and safety benefits to quick engagement and emergency preparedness in a pandemic, and it is important to identify those who conduct these behaviors. The present study examined who engaged in preparatory purchasing of safety and health care products during the early stages of the spread of COVID-19 and what stimulated this action. Results of a cross-sectional study (N = 344) indicates that possessing, or uncertainty about possessing a COVID-19 risk factor (but not differences in age, gender, race, or income), increased purchasing of preparatory health and safety products. Also, in line with past research on risk, affect, and behavior, worry mediated this relationship. Further, gender moderated the relationship between worry and purchasing, such that worry increased product purchasing for men, who were initially low in worry, but not for women. This study lends additional support to worry as a mediator between risk and safety-related behavior and has implications for understanding factors related to preparatory purchasing of health care products during pandemics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104894

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater perception of the risk and severity of COVID-19, greater news monitoring, and perceived scarcity were associated with more panic buying in recent surveys.

    “recent surveys assessing individuals from the US, China, India, and Pakistan found that greater perception of the risk and severity of COVID-19, greater news monitoring, and perceived scarcity were associated with more panic buying (Clemens et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2020; Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020; Zhang and Zhou, 2021).”

    From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Clemens et al., 2020

    The Results and Discussion report that US respondents who perceived themselves as having a COVID-19 risk factor, or were uncertain, reported more preparatory purchasing of health and safety products. The paper does not report associations of purchasing with perceived disease severity, news monitoring, or perceived scarcity. It also distinguishes self-protective preparatory purchasing from behavior characterized as panic buying. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Williams D.M. Rhodes R.E. Connor M.T. Affective Determinants of Health Behavior 2018 Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clemens, K. S., Matkovic, J., Faasse, K., & Geers, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Clemens, Kelly S.
Venue
Safety Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
130
Pages
104894
ISSN
0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039409335
Cited by
40
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Safety Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, disaster preparedness, worry, risk perception, gender differences, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review