Cited by 80Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionDigital Media and Philosophy

Does social media use make us happy? A meta-analysis on social media and positive well-being outcomes

Open access
Marciano, Laura, Lin, Jeffrey, Sato, Taisuke, Saboor, Sundas, Viswanath, Kasisomayajula·2024·SSM - Mental Health

Abstract

In social media use research on mental health, a comprehensive summary of the association between social media use and “positive” well-being in all its nuances, including different well-being indicators considered separately, is lacking. To fill the gap, we carried out a meta-analytic review of the literature by including 78 studies published between 2009 and September 2022. In our meta-analyses, we explored the association between social media use (time spent on using social media, active and passive use, communication, problematic use, social comparison, and other positive and negative experiences) and well-being (conceptualized as hedonic, eudaimonic, social, and other positive indices). Hedonic well-being, i.e., experiencing positive emotions and life satisfaction, was associated with social media communication (r=0.11) and positive online experiences (r=0.21) and negatively with problematic social media use (r=−0.13) and social comparison on social media (r=−0.30). Eudaimonic well-being, i.e., a sense of purpose and meaning, was only negatively related to problematic social media use (r=−0.26). Social well-being was positively related to social media time (r=0.07) and social media communication (r=0.18). Also, overall measures of positive well-being were associated with active social media use (r=0.08), communication through social media (r=0.12), number of friends (r=0.14), social media intensity (r=0.21), and other positive experiences (r=0.19). Conversely, social medi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of high-powered studies on social media use and well-being might be due to a limited focus on exploring the positive effects of social media.

    “It is worth noting that the lack of high‐powered studies on SMU and well‐being might be due to a limited focus on exploring the positive effects of social media (Marciano et al., 2024).”
  • The addition of 28 new reviews highlights ongoing challenges in the field, as findings remain inconclusive despite an expanding evidence base, updated methodologies, and increased focus on potential positive impacts.

    “The addition of 28 new reviews to this umbrella review highlights ongoing challenges in the field, as findings remain inconclusive despite an expanding evidence base, updated methodologies, and increased focus on potential positive impacts (Marciano et al., 2024).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 162 · Cited by 80

Authors
Marciano, L., Lin, J., Sato, T., Saboor, S., & Viswanath, K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Marciano, Laura
Venue
SSM - Mental Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
6
Pages
100331
ISSN
2666-5603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400036942
Cited by
80
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 4
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSM - Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R21HD115354-01)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (P500PS_202974)
  • Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5 P30 CA06516, R01 CA230355-01A1, 5U54 CA156732-10)
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
social media use, positive well-being, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, social well-being, social media addiction, social comparison, social media communication, active vs passive social media use, life satisfaction, positive emotions, meaningfulness, online experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review