Panel studies and migration
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Longitudinal data can help overcome some challenges associated with retrospective and indirect forms of data collection.
“They can be studied using longitudinal forms of data, which can also help overcoming some of the challenges associated with retrospective and indirect forms of data collection outlined above (Duncan and Kalton, 1987;Rindfuss et al., 2007).”
From Improving the evidence base: A methodological review of the quantitative climate migration literature (2021) · cites this paper as Rindfuss et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Rindfuss, R. R., Kaneda, T., Chattopadhyay, A., & Sethaput, C.
- Affiliations
- Population Reference Bureau (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Mahidol University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Rindfuss, Ronald R.
- Venue
- Social Science Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 374-403
- ISSN
- 0049-089X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081220626
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- migration, household panel survey, follow-up strategy, social networks, Northeast Thailand, survey nonresponse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review