When white people report racial discrimination: The role of region, religion, and politics
Abstract
Scholarly interest in the correlates and consequences of perceived discrimination has grown exponentially in recent years, yet, despite increased legal and media attention to claims of "anti-white bias," empirical studies predicting reports of racial discrimination by white Americans remain limited. Using data from the 2006 Portraits of American Life Study, we find that evangelical Protestantism increases the odds that whites will report experiencing racial discrimination, even after controlling for racial context and an array of social and psychological characteristics. However, this effect is limited to the South. Outside the South, political affiliation trumps religion, yielding distinct regional profiles of discrimination reporters. These findings suggest that institutions may function as regional "carriers" for whites inclined to report racial discrimination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Mayrl, D., & Saperstein, A.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mayrl, Damon
- Venue
- Social Science Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 742-754
- ISSN
- 0049-089X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008398554
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- racial discrimination, White Americans, evangelical Protestantism, religion, political affiliation, regional variation, South
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review