The color of juvenile justice: Racial disparities in dispositional decisions
Abstract
Existing research on dispositional decisions typically models the outcome as merely placed or not placed. However, this does not accurately reflect the wide variation in residential options available to juvenile court actors. In this research, we combine data from ProDES, which tracks adjudicated youth in Philadelphia, with data from the Program Design Inventory, which describes over 100 intervention programs, to further examine the factors that influence court actors' decision making in selecting an appropriate program for a juvenile offender. We find that even after controlling for legal and needs-based factors, race continues to exert a significant influence, with decision makers being significantly more likely to commit minority youth to facilities using physical regimen as their primary modality and reserving smaller, therapeutic facilities for their white counterparts. Using focal concerns theory as an explanatory lens, we suggest that court actors in this jurisdiction employ a racialized perceptual shorthand of youthful offenders that attributes both higher levels of blame and lower evaluations of reformability to minority youth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 107
- Authors
- Fader, J. J., Kurlychek, M. C., & Morgan, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fader, Jamie J.
- Venue
- Social Science Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 44
- Pages
- 126-140
- ISSN
- 0049-089X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073496933
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 13.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- juvenile justice, racial disparities, residential placement, juvenile detention, focal concerns theory, racial bias, juvenile offenders, Philadelphia
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Black or African American, Criminal Law, Decision Making, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Minority Groups, Social Justice, Stereotyping, Philadelphia, Law Enforcement, White People, Racial Groups, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review