Multicollinearity in hierarchical linear models
Abstract
This study investigates an ill-posed problem (multicollinearity) in Hierarchical Linear Models from both the data and the model perspectives. We propose an intuitive, effective approach to diagnosing the presence of multicollinearity and its remedies in this class of models. A simulation study demonstrates the impacts of multicollinearity on coefficient estimates, associated standard errors, and variance components at various levels of multicollinearity for finite sample sizes typical in social science studies. We further investigate the role multicollinearity plays at each level for estimation of coefficient parameters in terms of shrinkage. Based on these analyses, we recommend a top-down method for assessing multicollinearity in HLMs that first examines the contextual predictors (Level-2 in a two-level model) and then the individual predictors (Level-1) and uses the results for data collection, research problem redefinition, model re-specification, variable selection and estimation of a final model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The assumptions of the multiple linear regression model were checked, with special attention to multicollinearity, verified when condition indices were greater than 10.
“The assumptions of the model were checked paying special attention to the possible presence of multi-collinearity, which was verified when the condition indices were greater than 10 [28].”
From Impaired Balance in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Predictors of the Impact of This Disorder and Balance Confidence (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 · Cited by 6,788 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peinado-Rubia, A., Osuna-Pérez, M. C., Rodríguez-Almagro, D., Zagalaz-Anula, N., López-Ruiz, M. C., & Lomas-Vega, R. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17093160 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kane, L., & Ashbaugh, A. R. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104208 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yu, H., Jiang, S., & Land, K. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Toledo (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Land, Kenneth C.
- Venue
- Social Science Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 118-136
- ISSN
- 0049-089X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W210577557
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- multicollinearity, multilevel analysis, ill-posed problems, coefficient estimates, standard errors, variance components, shrinkage estimation, contextual predictors, feature selection, model specification
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Theoretical, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Social Sciences, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review