Cited by 15Migration, Health and TraumaHealth disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

From the West Indies to Africa: A universal generational decline in health among blacks in the United States

Hamilton, Tod G., Green, Tiffany L.·2018·Social Science Research

Abstract

Research shows that foreign-born blacks have better health profiles than their U.S.-born counterparts. Less is known, however, regarding whether black immigrants' favorable health outcomes persist across generations or whether these patterns differ across the diverse sending regions for black immigrants. In this study, we use data from the 1996-2014 waves of the March Current Population Survey (CPS) to investigate generational differences in self-rated health among blacks with West Indian, Haitian, Latin American, and African ancestry. We show that first-generation black immigrants have a lower probability of reporting fair/poor health than third/higher generation blacks. The health advantage of the first generation over the third/higher generation is slightly more prounced among the foreign-born who migrated to the United States after age 13. Second-generation immigrants with two foreign-born parents are generally less likely to report their health as fair/poor than the third/higher generation. However, we find no evidence that self-reported fair/poor health varies between second-generation immigrants with mixed nativity parents (only one foreign-born parent) and the third/higher generation. These general patterns hold across each of the ancestral subgroups in the study sample. In summary, our findings highlight a remarkable convergence in health across immigrant generations among blacks in the United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamilton, T. G., & Green, T. L.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Hamilton, Tod G.
Venue
Social Science Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
73
Pages
163-174
ISSN
0049-089X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2775593748
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
Black immigrants, self-rated health, health convergence, African ancestry, nativity, immigrant children, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review