Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 407

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recurrent Variations in DNA Methylation in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Differentiated Derivatives

Open access
Nazor, Kristopher L., Altun, Gulsah, Lynch, Candace, Tran, Ha, Harness, Julie V., Slavin, Ileana, Garitaonandia, Ibon, Müller, Franz-Josef, Wang, Yu-Chieh, Boscolo, Francesca S., Fakunle, Eyitayo, Dumevska, Biljana, Lee, Sunray, Park, Hyun Sook, Olee, Tsaiwei, D'Lima, Darryl D., Semechkin, Ruslan, Parast, Mana M., Galat, Vasiliy, Laslett, Andrew L., Schmidt, Uli, Keirstead, Hans S., Loring, Jeanne F., Laurent, Louise C.·2012·Cell Stem Cell

Abstract

SUMMARY Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are potential sources of cells for modeling disease and development, drug discovery, and regenerative medicine. However, it is important to identify factors that may impact the utility of hPSCs for these applications. In an unbiased analysis of 205 hPSC and 130 somatic samples, we identified hPSC-specific epigenetic and transcriptional aberrations in genes subject to X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and genomic imprinting, which were not corrected during directed differentiation. We also found that specific tissue types were distinguished by unique patterns of DNA hypomethylation, which were recapitulated by DNA demethylation during in vitro directed differentiation. Our results suggest that verification of baseline epigenetic status is critical for hPSC-based disease models in which the observed phenotype depends on proper XCI or imprinting, and that tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns can be accurately modeled during directed differentiation of hPSCs, even in the presence of variations in XCI or imprinting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.013

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 407

Metadata

Authors
Nazor, K. L., Altun, G., Lynch, C., Tran, H., Harness, J. V., Slavin, I., Garitaonandia, I., Müller, F.-J., Wang, Y.-C., Boscolo, F. S., Fakunle, E., Dumevska, B., Lee, S., Park, H. S., Olee, T., D'Lima, D. D., Semechkin, R., Parast, M. M., Galat, V., Laslett, A. L., Schmidt, U., Keirstead, H. S., Loring, J. F., & Laurent, L. C.
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
620-634
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W2152627215
Cited by
407
References
5
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.