Japan strengthens regenerative medicine oversight
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In September 2014, the Japanese Diet enacted laws and amendments intended to improve and simplify the regulation of regenerative medicine in Japan.
“In September 2014, the Japanese Diet, or legislature, enacted a set of laws and amendments intended to improve and simplify the regulation of regenerative medicine in Japan”
From Brief summary of the regulatory frameworks of regenerative medicine therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Sipp and Okano, 2018
No passage from our copy was provided, and searches for “September 2014,” the Japanese Diet, regulation, and the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine returned no matches. Our copy therefore does not verify the attributed date, legislative action, or stated purpose. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brief summary of the regulatory frameworks of regenerative medicine therapies
Yoon, J., Lee, S., Kim, M. J., & Kim, J.-H. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1486812 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sipp, D., & Okano, H.
- Venue
- Cell Stem Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-156
- ISSN
- 1934-5909
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (17bk0204001s0102)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
