Cited by 374Muscle Physiology and DisordersMesenchymal stem cell researchCongenital heart defects research

Aging disrupts muscle stem cell function by impairing matricellular WISP1 secretion from fibro-adipogenic progenitors

Open access
Lukjanenko, Laura, Karaz, Sonia, Stuelsatz, Pascal, Gurriaran-Rodriguez, Uxia, Michaud, Joris, Dammone, Gabriele, Sizzano, Federico, Mashinchian, Omid +12 more·2019·Cell stem cell

Abstract

Research on age-related regenerative failure of skeletal muscle has extensively focused on the phenotypes of muscle stem cells (MuSCs). In contrast, the impact of aging on regulatory cells in the MuSC niche remains largely unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that aging impairs the function of mouse fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs) and thereby indirectly affects the myogenic potential of MuSCs. Using transcriptomic profiling, we identify WNT1 Inducible Signaling Pathway Protein 1 (WISP1) as a FAP-derived matricellular signal that is lost during aging. WISP1 is required for efficient muscle regeneration and controls the expansion and asymmetric commitment of MuSCs through Akt signaling. Transplantation of young FAPs or systemic treatment with WISP1 restores the myogenic capacity of MuSCs in aged mice and rescues skeletal muscle regeneration. Our work establishes that loss of WISP1 from FAPs contributes to MuSC dysfunction in aged skeletal muscles and demonstrates that this mechanism can be targeted to rejuvenate myogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2018.12.014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advancing age drives aberrant signaling in FAPs that stimulates profibrotic behavior and skeletal muscle fibrosis, and compromises satellite cell function.

    “Advancing age drives aberrant signaling in FAPs that stimulates their profibrotic behavior and skeletal muscle fibrosis, and simultaneously compromises satellite cell function”
  • During ageing, the number of fibroadipogenic progenitors declines, and so does their ability to produce paracrine factors such as WISP1, leading to diminished MuSC support and contributing to the decline in MuSC function.

    “During ageing, the number the of fibroadipogenic progenitors declines, and so does their ability to produce paracrine factors such as WNT1-inducible signalling pathway protein 1 (WISP1), a non-structural protein of the ECM10. This leads to diminished MuSC support and contributes to the decline in MuSC function during ageing10.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 374

Authors
Lukjanenko, L., Karaz, S., Stuelsatz, P., Gurriaran-Rodriguez, U., Michaud, J., Dammone, G., Sizzano, F., Mashinchian, O., Ancel, S., Migliavacca, E., Liot, S., Jacot, G., Metairon, S., Raymond, F., Descombes, P., Palini, A., Chazaud, B., Rudnicki, M. A., Bentzinger, C. F., & Feige, J. N.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Venue
Cell stem cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
433-446.e7
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W2912606098
Cited by
374
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 13
FWCI
15.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell stem cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Nestec
  • Fondation Suisse de Recherche sur les Maladies Musculaires
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé
  • ThéCell Network
  • Canadian Stem Cell Network
  • CHUS Foundation
  • Banting Research Foundation
  • Research Chair of the Centre de recherche médicale de l’Université de Sherbrooke
  • NIH (R01AR044031)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-148387)
  • Muscular Dystrophy Association
  • Stem Cell Network
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
aging, muscle stem cells, fibro-adipogenic progenitors, WISP1, skeletal muscle regeneration, myogenesis, Akt signaling, asymmetric cell division
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Stem Cells, Adipocytes, Mice, Knockout, Muscle, Skeletal, Adipogenesis, Mice, CCN Intercellular Signaling Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review