Cited by 46

A Standard Nomenclature for Referencing and Authentication of Pluripotent Stem Cells

Kurtz, Andreas, Seltmann, Stefanie, Bairoch, Amos, Bittner, Marie-Sophie, Bruce, Kevin, Capes-Davis, Amanda, Clarke, Laura, Crook, Jeremy M. +24 more·2018·Stem Cell Reports

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.12.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no universally accepted naming convention for all cell lines, but some fields, such as PSCs, have published standards to systematically create unique cell line identifiers.

    “Although there is no universally accepted naming convention for all cell lines, some fields, such as PSCs, have published standards to systematically create unique cell line identifiers (Kurtz et al., 2018; Reid, 2017).”

    From Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0) (2021) · cites this paper as Kurtz et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Barrett T. Clark K. Gevorgyan R. Gorelenkov V. Gribov E. Karsch-Mizrachi I. Kimelman M. Pruitt K.D. Resenchuk S. Tatusova T. BioProject and BioSample databases at NCBI: facilitating capture and organization of metadata Nucleic Acids Res. 40 DI 2012 D57 D63 22139929 PMC3245069
  2. De Sousa P.A. Steeg R. Wachter E. Bruce K. King J. Hoeve M. Khadun S. McConnachie G. Holder J. Kurtz A. Rapid establishment of the European bank for induced pluripotent stem cells (EBiSC)—the hot start experience Stem Cell Res. 20 2017 105 114 28334554
  3. Dirks W.G. Drexler H.G. Online verification of human cell line identity by STR DNA typing Methods Mol. Biol. 731 2011 45 55 21516397
  4. Dirks W.G. Drexler H.G. STR DNA typing of human cell lines: detection of intra- and interspecies cross-contamination Methods Mol. Biol. 946 2013 27 38 23179824
  5. Faulconbridge A. Burdett T. Brandizi M. Gostev M. Pereira R. Vasant D. Sarkans U. Brazma A. Parkinson H. Updates to BioSamples database at European Bioinformatics Institute Nucleic Acids Res. 42 DI 2014 D50 D52 24265224 PMC3965081
  6. French A. Bravery C. Smith J. Chandra A. Archibald P. Gold J.D. Artzi N. Kim H.W. Barker R.W. Meissner A. Enabling consistency in pluripotent stem cell- derived products for research and development and clinical applications through material standards Stem Cells Transl. Med. 4 2015 217 223 25650438 PMC4339854
  7. Isasi R. Andrews P.W. Baltz J.M. Bredenoord A.L. Burton P. Chiu I.M. Hull S.C. Jung J.W. Kurtz A. Lomax G. Identifiability and privacy in pluripotent stem cell research Cell Stem Cell 14 2014 427 430 24702994 PMC4815907
  8. Kim J.H. Kurtz A. Yuan B.Z. Zeng F. Lomax G. Loring J.F. Crook J. Ju J.H. Clarke L. Inamdar M.S. Report of the International Stem Cell Banking Initiative workshop activity: current hurdles and progress in seed-stock banking of human pluripotent stem cells Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6 2017 1956 1962 29067781 PMC6430055
  9. Kobold S. Guhr A. Löser P. Kurtz A. Human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cell research trends: complementation and diversification of the field Stem Cell Reports 4 2015 914 925 25866160 PMC4437486
  10. Luong M.X. Auerbach J. Crook J.M. Daheron L. Hei D. Lomax G. Loring J.F. Ludwig T. Schlaeger T.M. Smith K.P. A call for standardized naming and reporting of human ESC and iPSC lines Cell Stem Cell 8 2011 357 359 21474098
  11. McKernan R. Watt F.M. What is the point of large-scale collections of human induced pluripotent stem cells? Nat. Biotechnol. 31 2013 875 877 24104747 PMC3825502
  12. Morrison M. Bell J. George C. Harmon S. Munsie M. Kaye J. The European General Data Protection Regulation: challenges and considerations for iPSC researchers and biobanks Regen. Med. 12 2017 693 703 28976812 PMC5857917
  13. Ruitberg C.M. Reeder D.J. Butler J.M. STRBase: a short tandem repeat DNA database for the human identity testing community Nucleic Acids Res. 29 2001 320 322 11125125 PMC29767
  14. Seltmann S. Lekschas F. Müller R. Stachelscheid H. Bittner M.S. Zhang W. Kidane L. Seriola A. Veiga A. Stacey G. hPSCreg—the human pluripotent stem cell registry Nucleic Acids Res. 44 DI 2016 D757 D763 26400179 PMC4702942

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurtz, A., Seltmann, S., Bairoch, A., Bittner, M.-S., Bruce, K., Capes-Davis, A., Clarke, L., Crook, J. M., Daheron, L., Dewender, J., Faulconbridge, A., Fujibuchi, W., Gutteridge, A., Hei, D. J., Kim, Y.-O., Kim, J.-H., Kokocinski, A. K., Lekschas, F., Lomax, G. P., Loring, J. F., Ludwig, T., Mah, N., Matsui, T., Müller, R., Parkinson, H., Sheldon, M., Smith, K., Stachelscheid, H., Stacey, G., Streeter, I., Veiga, A., & Xu, R.-H.
Venue
Stem Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
2213-6711
Cited by
46
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • European Commission (334502)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative
  • Wellcome Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review