Diagnostic performance of salivary cortisol and serum osteocalcin measurements in patients with overt and subclinical Cushing's syndrome.
Abstract
Objective The cut-off value for salivary cortisol measurement for the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome (CS) may depend both on the severity of the disease and the composition of control group. Therefore, we examined the utility of midnight salivary cortisol measurements in patients who were evaluated for signs and symptoms of CS or because they had adrenal incidentalomas. Because serum osteocalcin (OC) is considered as a sensitive marker of hypercortisolism, we also investigated whether OC could have a role in the diagnosis of CS.Patients and methods Each of the 151 patients was included into one of the following groups: (A) overt CS (n=23), (B) subclinical CS (n=18), (C) inactive adrenal adenomas (n=40), (D) patients without HPA disturbances (n=70). Patients (C+D) were used as controls. Serum, salivary and urinary cortisol, and OC were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.Results Group A had suppressed OC as compared to both group B and group (C+D). Serum and salivary cortisol concentrations showed strong negative correlations with OC in patients with overt CS. The areas under the curves of salivary and serum cortisol at 24:00 h (0.9790 and 0.9940, respectively) serum cortisol after low dose dexamethasone test (0.9930) and OC (0.9220) obtained from ROC analysis for the diagnosis of overt CS were not statistically different.Conclusion This study confirms the usefulness of midnight salivary cortisol measurements in the diagnosis of overt CS in the everyday endocrinological praxis. Our results suggest that OC may have a role in the diagnosis of overt CS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies on the diagnostic accuracy of salivary cortisol assays are hardly comparable because of differences in patient and control selection and in laboratory methods.
“the various studies on the diagnostic accuracy of the different salivary cortisol assays are hardly comparable for differences in the patients' and controls' selection criteria and in the diagnostic performance and sample collection techniques of the various laboratory methods (75).”
From Diagnosis and Treatment of Subclinical Hypercortisolism (2011) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Sereg, M., Tőke, J., Patócs, A., Varga, I., Igaz, P., Szücs, N., Horányi, J., Pusztai, P., Czirják, S., Gláz, E., Rácz, K., & Tóth, M.
- Affiliations
- Semmelweis University (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Tóth, Miklós
- Venue
- Steroids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 38-42
- ISSN
- 0039-128X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966231504
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Steroids (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Keywords
- Cushing's syndrome, subclinical Cushing's syndrome, salivary cortisol, serum osteocalcin, hypercortisolism, adrenal incidentaloma, adrenal adenoma, diagnostic biomarkers, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Cushing Syndrome, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Immunoassay, Male, Middle Aged, Saliva, Osteocalcin, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review