Changes in soil organic carbon stocks under agriculture in Brazil
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These losses should be attributed more to the disturbance of native or restored ecosystems, which consistently reduces SOC, than to the cultivation of any specific crop.
“These losses should be attributed more to the disturbance of native or restored ecosystems, which consistently reduces SOC (Davidson & Ackerman, 1993;Guo & Gifford, 2002;Murty et al., 2002;West et al., 2004;Zinn et al., 2005), than to the cultivation of any specific crop.”
From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Zinn et al., 2005
Because grasslands tend to have high SOC, conversion of native ecosystems to pasture generally does not release SOC, and sometimes results in modest SOC sequestration.
“Because grasslands tend to have high SOC, conversion of native ecosystems to pasture generally does not release SOC, and sometimes results in modest SOC sequestration (Fisher et al., 1994;Guo & Gifford, 2002;Murty et al., 2002;Osher et al., 2003;Zinn et al., 2005).”
From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Zinn et al., 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 63 · Cited by 241
- Authors
- Zinn, Y. L., Lal, R., & Resck, D. V. S.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Embrapa (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Zinn, Yuri L.
- Venue
- Soil and Tillage Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-40
- ISSN
- 0167-1987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074313178
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil and Tillage Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ohio State University
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Ministério da Educação
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- soil organic carbon stocks, land use conversion, agricultural intensification, Oxisol, highly weathered soils, conservation tillage, perennial crops, pasture, clay content, iron and aluminum oxides, carbon sequestration, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review