Overall assessment of soil quality on humid sandy loams: effects of location, rotation and tillage
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most visual soil assessment methods target mainly soil structure, sometimes in relation to productivity.
“Most of these methods target mainly soil structure, sometimes in relation to productivity (Abdollahi et al., 2015; Mueller et al., 2013).”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Abdollahi et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Abdollahi, L., Hansen, E. M., Rickson, R. J., & Munkholm, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Cranfield University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abdollahi, Lotfollah
- Venue
- Soil and Tillage Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 145
- Pages
- 29-36
- ISSN
- 0167-1987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979240621
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil and Tillage Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- soil quality, sandy loam soil, crop rotation, tillage systems, soil structure, conservation tillage, no-tillage, mouldboard ploughing, harrowing, crop yield, water balance, humid climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
