Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These recent studies apply multivariate statistical methods to select the most relevant indicators.
“that apply multivariate statistical methods to select the most relevant indicators”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Askari and Holden, 2015
The flexible and context-specific approach to soil quality assessment of the SMAF has inspired several recent studies.
“The fl exible and context-speci fi c approach to soil quality assessment of the SMAF as described above has inspired several recent studies”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Askari and Holden, 2015
These recent studies often rely on assumed but not assessed connections between indicators and soil functions.
“often based on assumed but not assessed connections between indicators and soil functions”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Askari and Holden, 2015
These recent studies utilize scoring functions to arrive at a soil quality index geared to the specific conditions.
“and utilize scoring functions to arrive at a soil quality index geared to the speci fi c conditions”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Askari and Holden, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 203
- Authors
- Askari, M. S., & Holden, N. M.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Askari, Mohammad Sadegh
- Venue
- Soil and Tillage Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 57-67
- ISSN
- 0167-1987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093879545
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 16.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil and Tillage Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- soil quality index, reduced tillage, conventional tillage, crop rotation, monoculture, Minimum Data Set, soil structure, soil nitrogen, C/N ratio, aggregate size distribution, bulk density, penetration resistance, soil respiration, soil quality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
