Cited by 25Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Structural Basis for the Dual Substrate Specificity of DOCK7 Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor

Open access
Kukimoto-Niino, Mutsuko, Tsuda, Kengo, Ihara, Kentaro, Mishima-Tsumagari, Chiemi, Honda, Keiko, Ohsawa, Noboru, Shirouzu, Mikako·2019·Structure

Abstract

The Dedicator Of CytoKinesis (DOCK) family of atypical guanine nucleotide exchange factors activates the Rho family GTPases Rac and/or Cdc42 through DOCK homology region 2 (DHR-2). Previous structural analyses of the DHR-2 domains of DOCK2 and DOCK9 have shown that they preferentially bind Rac1 and Cdc42, respectively; however, the molecular mechanism by which DHR-2 distinguishes between these GTPases is unclear. Here we report the crystal structure of the Cdc42-bound form of the DOCK7 DHR-2 domain showing dual specificity for Rac1 and Cdc42. The structure revealed increased substrate tolerance of DOCK7 at the interfaces with switch 1 and residue 56 of Cdc42. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations showed a closed-to-open conformational change in the DOCK7 DHR-2 domain between the Cdc42- and Rac1-bound states by lobe B displacement. Our results suggest that lobe B acts as a sensor for identifying different switch 1 conformations and explain how DOCK7 recognizes both Rac1 and Cdc42.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2019.02.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kukimoto-Niino, M., Tsuda, K., Ihara, K., Mishima-Tsumagari, C., Honda, K., Ohsawa, N., & Shirouzu, M.
Affiliations
RIKEN (JP)
Corresponding author
Shirouzu, Mikako
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
741-748.e3
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921928087
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (15K06987)
  • Drug Discovery and Life Science Research
  • AMED (JP18am0101082)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
DOCK7, guanine nucleotide exchange factor, Rho GTPase activation, Rac1, Cdc42, substrate specificity, conformational change, crystal structure, molecular dynamics simulation
MeSH terms
Crystallization, Humans, Molecular Conformation, Substrate Specificity, Mutagenesis, Crystallography, X-Ray, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, GTPase-Activating Proteins, cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, rac1 GTP-Binding Protein, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review