Cited by 8Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

OPUS-Rota5: A highly accurate protein side-chain modeling method with 3D-Unet and RotaFormer

Open access
Xu, Gang, Luo, Zhenwei, Yan, Yaming, Wang, Qinghua, Ma, Jianpeng·2024·Structure

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate protein side-chain modeling is crucial for protein folding and design. This is particularly true for molecular docking as ligands primarily interact with side chains. In this study, we introduce a two-stage side-chain modeling approach called OPUS-Rota5. It leverages a modified 3D-Unet to capture the local environmental features, including ligand information of each residue, and then employs the RotaFormer module to aggregate various types of features. Evaluation on three test sets, including recently released targets from CAMEO and CASP15, shows that OPUS-Rota5 significantly outperforms some other leading side-chain modeling methods. We also employ OPUS-Rota5 to refine the side chains of 25 G protein-coupled receptor targets predicted by AlphaFold2 and achieve a significantly improved success rate in a subsequent "back" docking of their natural ligands. Therefore, OPUS-Rota5 is a useful and effective tool for molecular docking, particularly for targets with relatively accurate predicted backbones but not side chains such as high-homology targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2024.03.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 8

Authors
Xu, G., Luo, Z., Yan, Y., Wang, Q., & Ma, J.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ma, Jianpeng
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1001-1010.e2
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395053034
Cited by
8
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1200400)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (2018SHZDZX01)
  • Science and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (23JS1400200)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32300535)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
3D U-Net, two-stage model, ligand binding, molecular docking, G protein-coupled receptors
MeSH terms
Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Protein Folding, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review