Cited by 9Pancreatic function and diabetesCellular transport and secretionDiabetes Treatment and Management

Secretory stimuli distinctly regulate insulin secretory granule maturation through structural remodeling

Open access
Deshmukh, Aneesh, Chang, Kevin, Cuala, Janielle, Hernandez Campos, Maria J., Mahmood, Shayan, Verma, Riva, Georgia, Senta, Loconte, Valentina +1 more·2025·Structure

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Insulin secretory granule (ISG) maturation is a crucial aspect of insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis. The regulation of this maturation remains poorly understood, especially how secretory stimuli affect ISG maturity and subcellular localization. In this study, we used soft X-tomography (SXT) to quantitatively map ISG morphology, density, and location in single INS-1E and mouse pancreatic β-cells under the effect of various secretory stimuli. We found that the activation of glucokinase (GK), gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor (GIPR), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), and G-protein coupled receptor 40 (GPR40) promote ISG maturation. Each stimulus induces unique structural remodeling in ISGs, by altering size and density, depending on the specific signaling cascades activated. These distinct ISG subpopulations mobilize and redistribute in the cell altering overall cellular structural organization. Our results provide insight into how current diabetes and obesity therapies impact ISG maturation and may inform the development of future treatments that target maturation specifically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2025.07.022

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Deshmukh, A., Chang, K., Cuala, J., Hernandez Campos, M. J., Mahmood, S., Verma, R., Georgia, S., Loconte, V., & White, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
White, Kate L.
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
1831-1843.e4
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413683713
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R35GM154893)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM138441)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
insulin secretion, pancreatic beta cells, glucokinase, GLP-1 receptor, GPR40, INS-1E cells, soft X-ray tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review