Transcription factors-golden keys to modulate the plant metabolism to develop salinity tolerance
Open accessAbstract
Abiotic stressors such as drought, low temperature, heavy metals, waterlogging, nutrient imbalance, and salinity are major factors that affect the growth and development of crop plants, which, in turn, results in severe loss in production and yield of economically important crops. Current literature backs up the effect of high salinity on almost all crop plants. Thus, it can be concluded that salinity stress is amongst the most dominant abiotic stress factors in current farming systems, which counteract achieving the goal of “zero hunger.” Consequently, there is a dire need to improve crop plants to develop salinity tolerance for higher yield and production, even in salinity agricultural habitats. The last few decades have established a mechanistic understanding and have identified the molecular determinants favoring salinity tolerance in crop plants. Stress-responsive transcriptional control is the best strategy crop plants adapt to alleviate abiotic stressors, especially salinity stress. In crop plants, transcription factors (TFs) central to the regulation of salinity tolerance include bZIP, WRKY, NAC, AP2/ERFBP, bZIP, and MYB. Studying these TFs and their molecular mechanisms can facilitate their molecular modification at the genetic level to modify crop plants for stress tolerance. Collectively, these reports suggest that TFs enhance tolerance to salinity stress directly or indirectly through diverse signaling pathways. This review summarizes the recent developments in deciphering the mechanistic regulation of TFs in controlling the cellular process and gene expression under salinity stress. Finally, we highlight the way forward in applying genome editing technologies to modulate TFs as hallmark genes in circumventing salinity stress in crop plants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Almost all hyperaccumulators have genetically adapted to accumulate various metal ions and have been used in phytomining technologies for their extraction.
“Almost all hyperaccumulators have genetically adapted to accumulate various metal ions and have been used in phytomining technologies for their extraction (van der Ent et al., 2015; Yaqoob et al., 2023; Bhat et al., 2024).”
From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Bhat et al., 2024
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 339 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Bhat, B. A., Mir, R. A., Mir, W. R., Hamdani, S. S., & Mir, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Kashmir (IN)
- Central University of Kashmir (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Mir, Manzoor Ahmad
- Venue
- Plant Stress
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 100409
- ISSN
- 2667-064X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391925075
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 339
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Stress (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Keywords
- salt tolerance, transcription factors, abiotic stress, salt stress, bZIP, WRKY, NAC, AP2/ERF, MYB, stress-responsive gene regulation, signaling pathways, genome editing, cultivated plants, plant metabolism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review