Cited by 51Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Profile and outcome of pure androgen-secreting adrenal tumors in women: experience of 21 cases

Moreno, Sebastián, Montoya, Guillermo, Armstrong, John, Leteurtre, Emmanuelle, Aubert, Sebastien, Vantyghem, Marie-Christine, Dewailly, Didier, Wemeau, Jean-Louis +1 more·2004·Surgery

Abstract

Background The aim of the study was to determine the outcome and possible prognostic factors of pure androgen-secreting adrenal tumors (PASATs).Methods In a review of 801 adrenal operations from 1970 through 2003, 21 women with PASATs were divided into 2 groups, benign and undetermined tumors (Weiss score < or = 3) (BT = 11) and malignant tumors (Weiss > or =4 or nonresectable) (MT = 10).Results In both groups, age at presentation was similar. There were no differences concerning type of secretion, but increase in testosterone level was 2.6-fold greater in malignant tumors (MT) than benign tumors (BT). Imaging studies allowed diagnosis of malignancy in 4 of 10 MT. Size and weight were greater for MT than for BT (average, 13.7 vs 9.2 cm and 1462 vs 206 g). At follow-up (median, 17 y; range, 1 to 33 y) 2 of 11 patients with BT died of unrelated causes, and 9 of 11 are alive without recurrence; 5 of 10 patients with MT died of disease, and 3 are alive with disease; 7 of those 8 patients had stage III or IV disease and/or had a Weiss score of 6 or greater. Two patients with MT are alive without disease; both were Weiss 7, stage II and received mitotane postoperatively.Conclusions PASATs of undetermined benign condition share the good prognosis of BT. Weiss score is diagnostic of malignancy. MacFarlane classification determines the prognosis, and long-term disease-free survivors at stages III/IV are never observed after operation only. Postoperative mitotane therapy might be beneficial at stage II.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.046

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated sex steroids are highly suspicious for ACC and urgent diagnostic evaluation is required.

    “Although benign cortisol-secreting adenomas may very rarely produce androgens (286), elevated sex steroids are highly suspicious for ACC and urgent diagnostic evaluation is required (287-289).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [289]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 51

Authors
Moreno, S., Montoya, G., Armstrong, J., Leteurtre, E., Aubert, S., Vantyghem, M.-C., Dewailly, D., Wemeau, J.-L., & Proye, C.
Affiliations
Université de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Proye, Charles
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
136
Issue
6
Pages
1192-1198
ISSN
0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033842463
Cited by
51
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
adrenal tumors, Weiss score, long-term prognosis, disease-free survival, testosterone secretion, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adrenalectomy, Adult, Androgens, Child, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Testosterone, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review