Cited by 196Thyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesHealthcare Quality and Management

Pediatric endocrine surgery: Who is operating on our children?

Tuggle, Charles T., Roman, Sanziana A., Wang, Tracy S., Boudourakis, Leon, Thomas, Daniel C., Udelsman, Robert, Ann Sosa, Julie·2008·Surgery

Abstract

Background High surgeon volume is associated with improved outcomes in adult endocrine surgery. This is the first population-based outcomes study for thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy in children.Methods Cross-sectional analyses were performed using 1999 to 2005 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Outcomes included complications, length of stay (LOS), and costs. High-volume surgeons performed >30 cervical endocrine procedures per year in adults and children; pediatric surgeons restricted >90% of their practices to patients </=17 years old. Other surgeons fell into neither category. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.Results We included 607 patients, representing 20% of the pediatric endocrine operations done between 1999 and 2005 in the United States. Seventy-six percent of patients were female. Among the procedures performed, 92% were thyroidectomies and 8% were parathyroidectomies. Surgeons were classified as follows: 18% High-volume, 21% Pediatric, and 61% Other. High-volume surgeons had the lowest LOS (1.5 days vs 2.3 Pediatric, 2.0 Other; P = .01), costs ($12,474 vs $19,594 Pediatric, $13,614 Other; P < .01), and complications (6% vs 11% Pediatric, 10% Other; P = NS). In multivariate analyses, case volume of the endocrine surgeons was an independent predictor of LOS and costs.Conclusion High-volume surgeons have better outcomes after thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy in children compared with Pediatric and Other surgeons. Surgeon experience was an independent predictor of LOS and costs. High-volume endocrine and pediatric surgeons could combine expertise to improve outcomes in children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surg.2008.08.033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 196

Authors
Tuggle, C. T., Roman, S. A., Wang, T. S., Boudourakis, L., Thomas, D. C., Udelsman, R., & Ann Sosa, J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
144
Issue
6
Pages
869-877
ISSN
0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991341553
Cited by
196
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, surgeon volume, high-volume surgeons, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, surgeon specialization, pediatric surgeons, hospitalization outcomes
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Length of Stay, Male, Parathyroid Diseases, General Surgery, Thyroid Diseases, Thyroidectomy, Parathyroidectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review