CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 245Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: A systematic review

Open access
Waljee, Jennifer, McGlinn, Evan P., Sears, Erika Davis, Chung, Kevin C.·2014·Surgery
DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015PMC PMC4170731
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Recent events in health care reform have brought national attention to integrating patient experiences and expectations into quality metrics. Few studies have comprehensively evaluated the effect of patient expectations on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgery. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the available literature describing the relationship between patient expectations and postoperative PROs.Methods We performed a search of the literature published before November 1, 2012. Articles were included in the review if (1) primary data were presented, (2) patient expectations regarding a surgical procedure were measured, (3) PROs were measured, and (4) the relationship between patient expectations and PROs was specifically examined. PROs were categorized into 5 subgroups: Satisfaction, quality of life (QOL), disability, mood disorder, and pain. We examined each study to determine the relationship between patient expectations and PROs as well as study quality.Results From the initial literature search yielding 1,708 studies, 60 articles were included. Fulfillment of expectations was associated with improved PROs among 24 studies. Positive expectations were correlated with improved PROs for 28 studies (47%), and poorer PROs for 9 studies (15%). Eighteen studies reported that fulfillment of expectations was correlated with improved patient satisfaction, and 10 studies identified that positive expectations were correlated with improved postoperative. Finally, patients with positive preoperative expectations reported less pain (8 studies) and disability (15 studies) compared with patients with negative preoperative expectations.Conclusion Patient expectations are inconsistently correlated with PROs after surgery, and there is no accepted method to capture perioperative expectations. Future efforts to rigorously measure expectations and explore their influence on postoperative outcomes can inform clinicians and policymakers seeking to integrate PROs into measures of surgical quality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 105 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–245 of 245

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Waljee, J., McGlinn, E. P., Sears, E. D., & Chung, K. C.
Affiliations
Michigan Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Chung, Kevin C.
ORCID
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
155
Issue
5
Pages
799-808
ISSN
0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015
PMC
PMC4170731
OpenAlex
W2062806164
Cited by
245
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (2R01 AR047328-06)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AR062066, K24 AR053120)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
patient expectations, patient-reported outcomes, postoperative outcomes, surgical quality metrics, patient satisfaction, quality of life, disability, mood disorders, postoperative pain, preoperative expectations
MeSH terms
Humans, Postoperative Pain, Pain, Postoperative, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Mood Disorders, Self Report, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review