The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patient perceptions on mesh use in hernia repair: a prospective, questionnaire-based study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“reports of lightweight mesh fracture are mounting for both polypropylene and monofilament polyester.30,33,34”
From Effect of Hernia Mesh Weights on Postoperative Patient-Related and Clinical Outcomes After Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Although lightweight mesh has demonstrated limitations in regard to durability for such repairs”
From Effect of Hernia Mesh Weights on Postoperative Patient-Related and Clinical Outcomes After Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Usher, 1962, Hernia repair with Marlex mesh. An analysis of 541 cases, Arch Surg, 84, 325, 10.1001/archsurg.1962.01300210059012 · DOI
- Sanders, 2012, Prosthetic mesh materials used in hernia surgery, Expert Rev Med Devices, 9, 159, 10.1586/erd.11.65 · DOI
- Bilsel, 2012, The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh materials and types, Int J Surg, 10, 317, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.002 · DOI
- Wales, 2019, The use of prosthetic mesh for abdominal wall repairs: a semi-systematic-literature review, Int Wound J, 16, 30, 10.1111/iwj.12977 · DOI
- Leber, 1998, Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias, Arch Surg, 133, 378, 10.1001/archsurg.133.4.378 · DOI · Paper page
- White, 1998, Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias, Am Surg, 64, 276
- Kumar, 2002, Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia, Br J Surg, 89, 1476, 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02260.x · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, 2013, Defining patients’ knowledge and perceptions of vaginal mesh surgery, Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 19, 282, 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31829ff765 · DOI
- Tenggardjaja, 2015, Evaluation of patients’ perceptions of mesh usage in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, Urology, 85, 326, 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.058 · DOI
- Koski, 2014, Patient perception of transvaginal mesh and the media, Urology, 84, 575, 10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.051 · DOI
- Noah, 2019, Giving personal injury attorneys who run misleading drugs ads a dose of their own medicine, Illinois Law Review, 2, 701
Cited by
Krpata, D. M., Petro, C. C., Prabhu, A. S., Tastaldi, L., Zolin, S., Fafaj, A., Rosenblatt, S., Poulose, B. K., Pierce, R. A., Warren, J. A., et al. (2021) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4309 · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- AlMarzooqi, R., Petro, C., Tish, S., Fafaj, A., Alkhatib, H., Tastaldi, L., Tu, C., Prabhu, A., Krpata, D., & Rosen, M.
- Venue
- Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 751-756
- ISSN
- 0039-6060
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient perceptions on mesh use in hernia repair: a prospective, questionnaire-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.surg.2019.12.005
- The paper
- AlMarzooqi, R., Petro, C., Tish, S., Fafaj, A., Alkhatib, H., Tastaldi, L., Tu, C., Prabhu, A., Krpata, D., & Rosen, M. (2020). Patient perceptions on mesh use in hernia repair: a prospective, questionnaire-based study. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.12.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.