Cited by 26Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

An evaluation of emergency general surgery transfers and a call for standardization of practices

Open access
Bruenderman, Elizabeth H., Block, Stacy B., Kehdy, Farid J., Benns, Matthew V., Miller, Keith R., Motameni, Amirreza, Nash, Nicholas A., Bozeman, Matthew C. +1 more·2021·Surgery

Abstract

Background There is an increasing trend toward regionalization of emergency general surgery, which burdens patients. The absence of a standardized, emergency general surgery transfer algorithm creates the potential for unnecessary transfers. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical reasoning prompting emergency general surgery transfers and to initiate a discussion for optimal emergency general surgery use.Methods Consecutive emergency general surgery transfers (December 2018 to May 2019) to 2 tertiary centers were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board-approved protocol. Clinical reasoning prompting transfer was obtained prospectively from the accepting/consulting surgeon. Patient outcomes were used to create an algorithm for emergency general surgery transfer.Results Two hundred emergency general surgery transfers (49% admissions, 51% consults) occurred with a median age of 59 (18 to 100) and body mass index of 30 (15 to 75). Insurance status was 25% private, 45% Medicare, 21% Medicaid, and 9% uninsured. Weekend transfers (Friday to Sunday) occurred in 45%, and 57% occurred overnight (6:00 pm to 6:00 am). Surgeon-to-surgeon communication occurred with 22% of admissions. Pretransfer notification occurred with 10% of consults. Common transfer reasons included no surgical coverage (20%), surgeon discomfort (24%), or hospital limitations (36%). A minority (36%) underwent surgery within 24 hours; 54% did not require surgery during the admission. Median length of stay was 6 (1 to 44) days.Conclusion Conditions prompting emergency general surgery transfers are heterogeneous in this rural state review. There remains an unmet need to standardize emergency general surgery transfer criteria, incorporating patient and hospital factors and surgeon availability. Well-defined requirements for communication with the accepting surgeon may prevent unnecessary transfers and maximize resource allocation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 26

Authors
Bruenderman, E. H., Block, S. B., Kehdy, F. J., Benns, M. V., Miller, K. R., Motameni, A., Nash, N. A., Bozeman, M. C., & Martin, R. C. G.
Affiliations
University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, Robert C.G.
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
169
Issue
3
Pages
567-572
ISSN
0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3090881279
Cited by
26
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
emergency general surgery, regionalization of care, clinical reasoning, surgeon availability, length of hospital stay, rural hospitals
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Indiana, Kentucky, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Transfer, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Referral and Consultation, General Surgery, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health Care Surveys, Young Adult, Standard of Care, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review