The Impact of Childhood Sexual Abuse on Women's Sexual Health: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) has been identified as a potent risk factor for sexual dysfunction. Certain characteristics of the abuse experience, such as repeated abuse, appear to affect the risk of developing sexual dysfunction. Despite the robust findings that CSA can be detrimental to sexual function, there is little consensus on the exact mechanisms that lead to these difficulties. AIM: To summarize the most up-to-date research on the relation between CSA and women's sexual function. METHODS: The published literature examining the prevalence of sexual dysfunction among women with CSA histories, various types of sexual dysfunctions, and mechanisms proposed to explain the relation between CSA and later sexual difficulties was reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Review of peer-reviewed literature. RESULTS: Women with abuse histories report higher rates of sexual dysfunction compared with their non-abused peers. The sexual concerns most commonly reported by women with abuse histories include problems with sexual desire and sexual arousal. Mechanisms that have been proposed to explain the relation between CSA and sexual dysfunction include cognitive associations with sexuality, sexual self-schemas, sympathetic nervous system activation, body image and esteem, and shame and guilt. CONCLUSION: Women with CSA histories represent a unique population in the sexual health literature. Review of mechanisms proposed to account for the relation between CSA and sexual health suggests that a lack of positive emotions related to sexuality, rather than greater negative emotions, appears to be more relevant to the sexual health of women with CSA histories. Treatment research has indicated that mindfulness-based sex therapy and expressive writing treatments are particularly effective for this group. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms that lead to sexual dysfunction for women with abuse histories to provide more targeted treatments for sexual dysfunction among women with abuse histories. Pulverman CS, Kilimnik CD, Meston CM. The Impact of Childhood Sexual Abuse on Women's Sexual Health: A Comprehensive Review. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:188-200.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pulverman et al. (2018) systematic review found women with a history of CSA reported significantly higher rates of sexual dysfunction than nonabused counterparts in well-controlled studies, with difficulties with arousal, desire, and orgasm the most common sources.
“women with a history of CSA reported significantly higher rates of sexual dysfunction than their nonabused counterparts in well-controlled studies”
From Child Sexual Abuse as a Unique Risk Factor for the Development of Psychopathology: The Compounded Convergence of Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as Pulverman et al. 2018
Pulverman et al. (2018) review cited the lack of positive emotions related to sex, rather than the presence of negative associations, as the most common mechanism explaining the relationship between CSA and sexual dysfunction.
“the lack of positive emotions related to sex (rather than the presence of negative associations) was cited as the most common mechanism explaining the relationship between CSA and sexual dysfunction”
From Child Sexual Abuse as a Unique Risk Factor for the Development of Psychopathology: The Compounded Convergence of Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as Pulverman et al. 2018
None of the few literature reviews focusing on specific outcomes focused specifically on the partner effect of a person's childhood maltreatment.
“Although a few literature reviews focusing on specific outcomes (e.g., sexuality, relationship satisfaction) included dyadic studies (Bigras et al., 2021; Pulverman et al., 2018; Zamir, 2021), none focused specifically on the partner effect of a person’s CM.”
From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Pulverman et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 151
- Authors
- Pulverman, C. S., Kilimnik, C. D., & Meston, C. M.
- Affiliations
- VA Heart of Texas Health Care Network (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meston, Cindy M.
- Venue
- Sexual Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 188-200
- ISSN
- 2050-0513 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-0521
- OpenAlex
- W2792680857
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sexual Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse, women's sexual health, sexual dysfunction, sexual desire, sexual arousal, sexual self-schemas, guilt and shame, body image, sympathetic activation, expressive writing
- MeSH terms
- Sexual Health, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Women's Health, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review