Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The participants would be able to have some level of listening comprehension, since knowing 2000-3000 word families has been found helpful for listening comprehension.
“Also, they would be able to have some level of listening comprehension since knowing 2000-3000 word families has been found to be helpful for listening comprehension (van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2013).”
From The Vocabulary Knowledge of Saudi EFL Tertiary Students (2019) · cites this paper as van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2013
Learners need to know 2000-3000 word families in order to obtain listening comprehension.
“The results showed that learners need to know 2000-3000 word families in order to obtain listening comprehension.”
From The Vocabulary Knowledge of Saudi EFL Tertiary Students (2019) · cites this paper as van Zeeland and Schmitt (2013)
Knowing 2000-3000 word families has been found to be helpful for listening comprehension.
“knowing 2000-3000 word families has been found to be helpful for listening comprehension (van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2013).”
From The Vocabulary Knowledge of Saudi EFL Tertiary Students (2019) · cites this paper as van Zeeland & Schmitt, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N.
- ORCID
- Schmitt, Norbert
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 609-624
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144250294
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 25.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- incidental vocabulary learning, second language listening, shape recognition, meaning recall, exposure frequency, attrition, listening comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
