Cited by 102Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesOnline and Blended LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Developing teachers' telecollaborative competences in online experiential learning

Vinagre, Margarita·2017·System

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2016.12.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Ala-Mutka, K., Redecker, C., Punie, Y., Ferrari, A., Cachia, R. & Centeno, C. (2010). The future of learning: European teachers’ visions. Report on a foresight consultation at the 2010 eTwinning Conference. JRC Technical Note 59775. Retrieved from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=3679.
  2. Arnold, 2009, Assessing online collaboration among language teachers: A cross-institutional case study, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8, 121
  3. Belz, 2003, Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration, Language Learning & Technology, 7, 68
  4. Curtis, 2001, Exploring collaborative online learning, JALN, 5, 21
  5. Del Moral, 2010, Formación del profesor 2.0: Desarrollo de competencias tecnológicas para la escuela 2.0, Revista Miscelánea de Investigación, 23, 59
  6. Dooly, 2009, New competencies in a new era? Examining the impact of a teacher training project, ReCALL, 21, 352, 10.1017/S0958344009990085 · DOI
  7. Dooly, 2013, Filling in the gaps: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education, ReCALL, 25, 4, 10.1017/S0958344012000237 · DOI
  8. Fuchs, 2012, Promoting learner autonomy through multiliteracy skills development in cross-institutional exchanges, Language Learning & Technology, 16, 82
  9. Gress, 2010, Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 806, 10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.012 · DOI
  10. Guichon, 2009, Training future language teachers to develop online tutors' competence through reflective analysis, ReCALL, 21, 166, 10.1017/S0958344009000214 · DOI
  11. Guth, 2011, Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration, ELT Journal, 66, 42, 10.1093/elt/ccr027 · DOI
  12. Hampel, 2005, New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 311, 10.1080/09588220500335455 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Judd, 2010, Using wikis for collaborative learning: Assessing collaboration through contribution, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 341, 10.14742/ajet.1079 · DOI
  14. Liaw, 2006, E-learning and the development of intercultural competence, Language Learning & Technology, 10, 49
  15. O'Dowd, 2013, The competences of the telecollaborative teacher, The Language Learning Journal, 1
  16. O'Dowd, 2009, Critical issues in telecollaborative task design, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 173, 10.1080/09588220902778369 · DOI
  17. Sauro, 2009, Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar, Language Learning & Technology, 13, 96
  18. Stickler, 2007, Designing online tutor training for language courses: A case study, Open Learning, 22, 75, 10.1080/02680510601100176 · DOI
  19. Strijbos, 2004, The effect of functional roles on group efficiency. Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups, Small Group Research, 35, 195, 10.1177/1046496403260843 · DOI
  20. Swan, 2006, Assessment and collaboration in online learning, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 45
  21. Vinagre, 2011, Computer-mediated corrective feedback and language accuracy in telecollaborative exchanges, Language Learning & Technology, 15, 72
  22. Vinagre, 2015, Training teachers for virtual collaboration: A case study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 787, 10.1111/bjet.12363 · DOI
  23. Vogt, 2006, Can you measure attitudinal factors in intercultural communication? Tracing the development of attitudes in e-mail projects, ReCALL, 18, 153, 10.1017/S095834400600022X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vinagre, M.
Affiliations
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Vinagre, Margarita
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
64
Pages
34-45
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2563805709
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Funders
Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (EDU2014-54673-R)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
virtual exchange, teacher competence, online teacher training, experiential learning, cooperative learning, online collaboration, reflective practice, wikis, online forums

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review