Temporal fluency and problem-solving in interaction: An exploratory study of fluency resources in L2 dialogue
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The fluency measures presented in Table 1 were chosen based on previous studies on monologic and dialogic fluency.
“The fluency measures presented in Table 1 were chosen based on previous studies on monologic and dialogic fluency (see, e.g., De Jong, 2018;Peltonen, 2017Peltonen, , 2020;;Tavakoli, 2016;Witton-Davies, 2014).”
From The impact of L1 speaking style, task mode, and L2 proficiency on L2 fluency: A within-subject study of monologic and dialogic speech (2025) · cites this paper as Peltonen, 2017
The interlocutor can assist the speaker in maintaining fluency during problem-solving sequences, such as word searches.
“the interlocutor can assist the speaker in maintaining fluency during problem-solving sequences, such as word searches”
From The impact of L1 speaking style, task mode, and L2 proficiency on L2 fluency: A within-subject study of monologic and dialogic speech (2025) · cites this paper as Peltonen, 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 82 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Peltonen, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Turku (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Peltonen, Pauliina
- ORCID
- Peltonen, Pauliina
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753141250
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- communication strategies, disfluency, Finnish learners of English, collaborative interaction, school level differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
