Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attending to learners’ affective needs: Teachers’ knowledge and practices

Thararuedee, Pariwat, Wette, Rosemary·2020·System

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2020.102375

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Arnold, 2019, The importance of affect in language learning, Neofilolog, 52, 11, 10.14746/n.2019.52.1.2 · doi:10.14746/n.2019.52.1.2
  2. Basturkmen, 2012, Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices, System, 40, 282, 10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Basturkmen, 2004, Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices, Applied Linguistics, 25, 243, 10.1093/applin/25.2.243 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cheng, 2007, The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 153, 10.2167/illt048.0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Connelly, 1997, Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape, Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 665, 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00014-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. De Sousa, 2001, Moral emotions, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 4, 109, 10.1023/A:1011434921610 · doi:10.1023/a:1011434921610
  7. Dörnyei, 1998, Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study, Language Teaching Research, 2, 203, 10.1177/136216889800200303 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gatbonton, 2008, Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behaviour: Novice and experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge, Language Teaching Research, 12, 161, 10.1177/1362168807086286 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Richards, 1996, Teachers’ maxims in language teaching, TESOL Quarterly, 30, 281, 10.2307/3588144 · DOI
  10. Rosiek, 2003, Emotional scaffolding an exploration of the teacher knowledge at the intersection of student emotion and the subject matter, Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 399, 10.1177/0022487103257089 · DOI
  11. Swain, 2013, The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning, Language Teaching, 46, 195, 10.1017/S0261444811000486 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wette, 2010, Professional knowledge in action: How experienced ESOL teachers respond to feedback from learners within syllabus and contextual constraints, System, 38, 569, 10.1016/j.system.2010.09.017 · DOI

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Thararuedee, P., & Wette, R.
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
95
Pages
102375
ISSN
0346-251X
Cited by
5
References
3
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.