The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidance values for microcystins in water and cyanobacterial supplement products (blue-green algal supplements): a reasonable or misguided approach?
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews current scientific knowledge on the toxicity and carcinogenicity of microcystins and compares this to the guidance values proposed for microcystins in water by the World Health Organization, and for blue-green algal food supplements by the Oregon State Department of Health. The basis of the risk assessment underlying these guidance values is viewed as being critical due to overt deficiencies in the data used for its generation: (i) use of one microcystin congener only (microcystin-LR), while the other presently known nearly 80 congeners are largely disregarded, (ii) new knowledge regarding potential neuro and renal toxicity of microcystins in humans and (iii) the inadequacies of assessing realistic microcystin exposures in humans and especially in children via blue-green algal food supplements. In reiterating the state-of-the-art toxicology database on microcystins and in the light of new data on the high degree of toxin contamination of algal food supplements, this review clearly demonstrates the need for improved kinetic data of microcystins in humans and for discussion concerning uncertainty factors, which may result in a lowering of the present guidance values and an increased routine control of water bodies and food supplements for toxin contamination. Similar to the approach taken previously by authorities for dioxin or PCB risk assessment, the use of a toxin equivalent approach to the risk assessment of microcystins is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ibelings, B. W., & Chorus, I. (2007) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.04.012 · Cited by 408
Genotoxicity and potential carcinogenicity of cyanobacterial toxins – a review
Žegura, B., Štraser, A., & Filipič, M. (2011) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.01.002 · Cited by 324
Toxins produced in cyanobacterial water blooms - toxicity and risks
Bláha, L., Babica, P., & Maršálek, B. (2009) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/v10102-009-0006-2 · Cited by 316
United States Pharmacopeia Safety Evaluation of Spirulina
Marles, R. J., Barrett, M. L., Barnes, J., Chavez, M. L., Gardiner, P., Ko, R., Mahady, G. B., Dog, T. L., Sarma, N. D., Giancaspro, G. I., et al. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408391003721719 · Cited by 177
Human Exposure to Cyanotoxins and their Effects on Health
Drobac, D., Tokodi, N., Simeunović, J., Baltić, V., Stanić, D., & Svirčev, Z. (2013) · Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology · doi:10.2478/10004-1254-64-2013-2320 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietrich, D., & Hoeger, S.
- Venue
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-289
- ISSN
- 0041-008X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033592111
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidance values for microcystins in water and cyanobacterial supplement products (blue-green algal supplements): a reasonable or misguided approach? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.taap.2004.09.005
- The paper
- Dietrich, D., & Hoeger, S. (2005). Guidance values for microcystins in water and cyanobacterial supplement products (blue-green algal supplements): a reasonable or misguided approach? Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.09.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.