Cited by 598Graphene and Nanomaterials ApplicationsNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsAnimal testing and alternatives

Limitations and relative utility of screening assays to assess engineered nanoparticle toxicity in a human cell line

Monteiro-Riviere, N.A., Inman, A.O., Zhang, L.W.·2009·Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Abstract

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), fullerenes (C(60)), carbon black (CB), nC(60), and quantum dots (QD) have been studied in vitro to determine their toxicity in a number of cell types. Here, we report that classical dye-based assays such as MTT and neutral red (NR) that determine cell viability produce invalid results with some NM (nanomaterials) due to NM/dye interactions and/or NM adsorption of the dye/dye products. In this study, human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK) were exposed in vitro to CB, SWCNT, C(60), nC(60), and QD to assess viability with calcein AM (CAM), Live/Dead (LD), NR, MTT, Celltiter 96 AQueous One (96 AQ), alamar Blue (aB), Celltiter-Blue (CTB), CytoTox Onetrade mark (CTO), and flow cytometry. In addition, trypan blue (TB) was quantitated by light microscopy. Assay linearity (R(2) value) was determined with HEK plated at concentrations from 0 to 25,000 cells per well in 96-well plates. HEK were treated with serial dilutions of each NM for 24 h and assessed with each of the viability assays. TB, CAM and LD assays, which depend on direct staining of living and/or dead cells, were difficult to interpret due to physical interference of the NM with cells. Results of the dye-based assays varied a great deal, depending on the interactions of the dye/dye product with the carbon nanomaterials (CNM). Results show the optimal high throughput assay for use with carbon and noncarbon NM was 96 AQ. This study shows that, unlike small molecules, CNM interact with ass…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.taap.2008.09.030

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nanomaterials have demonstrated chemical interference in cytotoxicity assays (e.g., carbon nanotubes interfering with MTT, engineered nanoparticles producing assay-dependent toxicity estimates, nanomaterial adsorption of marker enzymes causing artefacts).

    “This problem has been demonstrated particularly clearly for nanomaterials, where carbon nanotubes interfered with MTT-based viability measurements, engineered nanoparticles produced assay-dependent toxicity estimates, and nanomaterial adsorption of marker enzymes caused artefacts in cytotoxicity assays (Wohlleben et al., 2011; Wörle-Knirsch et al., 2006; Monteiro-Riviere et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monteiro-Riviere, N. A., Inman, A. O., & Zhang, L. W.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Monteiro-Riviere, N.A.
Venue
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
234
Issue
2
Pages
222-235
ISSN
0041-008X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094348762
Cited by
598
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 53
FWCI
22.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
cytotoxicity assay, dye-nanoparticle interaction, dye adsorption, single-walled carbon nanotubes, C60, carbon black, quantum dots, human epidermal keratinocytes, MTT assay, neutral red, calcein-AM, live/dead assay, Alamar Blue, trypan blue, assay linearity, high-throughput screening, nanomaterial risk assessment
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Cell Survival, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Flow Cytometry, Fluoresceins, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Light, Oxazines, Scattering, Radiation, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Tetrazolium Salts, Thiazoles, Trypan Blue, Xanthenes, Keratinocytes, Quantum Dots, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review