Limitations and relative utility of screening assays to assess engineered nanoparticle toxicity in a human cell line
Abstract
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), fullerenes (C(60)), carbon black (CB), nC(60), and quantum dots (QD) have been studied in vitro to determine their toxicity in a number of cell types. Here, we report that classical dye-based assays such as MTT and neutral red (NR) that determine cell viability produce invalid results with some NM (nanomaterials) due to NM/dye interactions and/or NM adsorption of the dye/dye products. In this study, human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK) were exposed in vitro to CB, SWCNT, C(60), nC(60), and QD to assess viability with calcein AM (CAM), Live/Dead (LD), NR, MTT, Celltiter 96 AQueous One (96 AQ), alamar Blue (aB), Celltiter-Blue (CTB), CytoTox Onetrade mark (CTO), and flow cytometry. In addition, trypan blue (TB) was quantitated by light microscopy. Assay linearity (R(2) value) was determined with HEK plated at concentrations from 0 to 25,000 cells per well in 96-well plates. HEK were treated with serial dilutions of each NM for 24 h and assessed with each of the viability assays. TB, CAM and LD assays, which depend on direct staining of living and/or dead cells, were difficult to interpret due to physical interference of the NM with cells. Results of the dye-based assays varied a great deal, depending on the interactions of the dye/dye product with the carbon nanomaterials (CNM). Results show the optimal high throughput assay for use with carbon and noncarbon NM was 96 AQ. This study shows that, unlike small molecules, CNM interact with ass…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nanomaterials have demonstrated chemical interference in cytotoxicity assays (e.g., carbon nanotubes interfering with MTT, engineered nanoparticles producing assay-dependent toxicity estimates, nanomaterial adsorption of marker enzymes causing artefacts).
“This problem has been demonstrated particularly clearly for nanomaterials, where carbon nanotubes interfered with MTT-based viability measurements, engineered nanoparticles produced assay-dependent toxicity estimates, and nanomaterial adsorption of marker enzymes caused artefacts in cytotoxicity assays (Wohlleben et al., 2011; Wörle-Knirsch et al., 2006; Monteiro-Riviere et al., 2009).”
From Cytotoxicity across OECD methods is not a single endpoint: context-dependent roles, variability and implications for decision-making (2026) · cites this paper as Monteiro-Riviere et al., 2009
Cites
Ryman-Rasmussen, J. P., Riviere, J. E., & Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700508 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physico-chemical features of engineered nanoparticles relevant to their toxicity
Fubini, B., Ghiazza, M., & Fenoglio, I. (2010) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2010.509519 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Kovrlija, I., Menshikh, K., Abreu, H., Cochis, A., Rimondini, L., Marsan, O., Rey, C., Combes, C., Locs, J., & Loca, D. (2024) · Biomaterials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213866 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Thoma, T., Löhr, L., Demuth, P., Hambruch, N., Oesch, F., & Landsiedel, R. (2026) · NAM Journal · doi:10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100126
- Authors
- Monteiro-Riviere, N. A., Inman, A. O., & Zhang, L. W.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Monteiro-Riviere, N.A.
- Venue
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 234
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 222-235
- ISSN
- 0041-008X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094348762
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 22.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Air Force
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Keywords
- cytotoxicity assay, dye-nanoparticle interaction, dye adsorption, single-walled carbon nanotubes, C60, carbon black, quantum dots, human epidermal keratinocytes, MTT assay, neutral red, calcein-AM, live/dead assay, Alamar Blue, trypan blue, assay linearity, high-throughput screening, nanomaterial risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Cell Line, Cell Survival, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Flow Cytometry, Fluoresceins, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Light, Oxazines, Scattering, Radiation, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Tetrazolium Salts, Thiazoles, Trypan Blue, Xanthenes, Keratinocytes, Quantum Dots, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review