The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanistic studies of in vitro cytotoxicity of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers in mammalian cells
Open accessAbstract
Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer nanoparticles have been demonstrated to elicit a well defined cytotoxicological response from mammalian cell lines, the response increasing systematically with dendrimer generation and number of surface amino groups. In this work, using generation G4, G5, and G6 dendrimers, this systematic response is furthermore demonstrated for the generation of reactive oxygen species, lysosomal activity, and the onset of apoptosis and levels of DNA damage. The results are consistent with a pathway of localisation of PAMAM dendrimers in the mitochondria leading to ROS production causing oxidative stress, apoptosis and DNA damage. ROS production is co-located in the mitochondria, and both generated levels and timescales are systematically generation dependent (G4<G5<G6). Flow cytometry confirms that with increasing dose, the percentage of healthy and early apoptotic cells decreases, whereas the late apoptotic and necrotic cell populations increase. This process is again systematically generation dependent. DNA damage as measured using the TUNEL assay further demonstrates a systematic trend, G4, G5 and G6 showing 4.69%, 25.87% and 89.63% DNA breakage respectively. Increases in lysosomal activity at timescales of ~24h are observed in HaCaT but not SW480 cells upon low concentration PAMAM exposure. Overall, significant differences are observed between the responses of the dermal cell line, HaCaT, and the colon cell line, SW480, and it is suggested that these can be understood in terms of differing intrinsic antioxidant levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polymeric Conjugates for Drug Delivery
Larson, N., & Ghandehari, H. (2012) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm2031569 · Cited by 580
Nanoconjugate formulations for enhanced drug delivery
Oner, E., Ilhan, M., Gultekin, H. E., & Karpuz, M. (2023) · Advanced and Modern Approaches for Drug Delivery · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91668-4.00023-x · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Mukherjee, S. P., Lyng, F. M., Garcia, A., Davoren, M., & Byrne, H. J.
- Venue
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-268
- ISSN
- 0041-008X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017701041
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanistic studies of in vitro cytotoxicity of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers in mammalian cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.taap.2010.08.016
- The paper
- Mukherjee, S. P., Lyng, F. M., Garcia, A., Davoren, M., & Byrne, H. J. (2010). Mechanistic studies of in vitro cytotoxicity of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers in mammalian cells. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2010.08.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.