Comparative sensitivity of human and rat neural cultures to chemical-induced inhibition of neurite outgrowth
Abstract
There is a need for rapid, efficient and cost-effective alternatives to traditional in vivo developmental neurotoxicity testing. In vitro cell culture models can recapitulate many of the key cellular processes of nervous system development, including neurite outgrowth, and may be used as screening tools to identify potential developmental neurotoxicants. The present study compared primary rat cortical cultures and human embryonic stem cell-derived neural cultures in terms of: 1) reproducibility of high content image analysis based neurite outgrowth measurements, 2) dynamic range of neurite outgrowth measurements and 3) sensitivity to chemicals which have been shown to inhibit neurite outgrowth. There was a large increase in neurite outgrowth between 2 and 24h in both rat and human cultures. Image analysis data collected across multiple cultures demonstrated that neurite outgrowth measurements in rat cortical cultures were more reproducible and had higher dynamic range as compared to human neural cultures. Human neural cultures were more sensitive than rat cortical cultures to chemicals previously shown to inhibit neurite outgrowth. Parallel analysis of morphological (neurite count, neurite length) and cytotoxicity (neurons per field) measurements were used to detect selective effects on neurite outgrowth. All chemicals which inhibited neurite outgrowth in rat cortical cultures did so at concentrations which did not concurrently affect the number of neurons per field, indicati…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human neurons showed greater sensitivity to neurite outgrowth inhibitors than rat neurons, demonstrating toxicodynamic differences between species.
“Harrill et al. (2011) demonstrated that human neurons showed greater sensitivity to neurite outgrowth inhibitors than rat neurons, highlighting toxicodynamic differences between species.”
From Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays (2026) · cites this paper as Harrill et al. (2011)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Putative adverse outcome pathways relevant to neurotoxicity
Bal-Price, A., Crofton, K. M., Sachana, M., Shafer, T. J., Behl, M., Forsby, A., Hargreaves, A., Landesmann, B., Lein, P. J., Louisse, J., et al. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2014.981331 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Harrill, J. A., Freudenrich, T., Wallace, K., Ball, K., Shafer, T. J., & Mundy, W. R. (2018) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.001 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationSpänle, J. V., Haiber, L. M., & Seeger, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2026.1800157 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harrill, J. A., Freudenrich, T. M., Robinette, B. L., & Mundy, W. R.
- Venue
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 256
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 268-280
- ISSN
- 0041-008X
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review