Cited by 93Analytical chemistry methods developmentForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of 7-aminoflunitrazepam in urine by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with liquid chromatography–electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ES-MS/MS) procedure was presented for the extraction and determination of 7-aminoflunitrazepam (7-aminoFM2), a biomarker of the hypnotic flunitrazepam (FM2) in urine sample. The method was based on the formation of tiny droplets of an organic extractant in the sample solution using water-immiscible organic solvent [dichloromethane (DCM), an extractant] dissolved in water-miscible organic dispersive solvent [isopropyl alcohol (IPA)]. First, 7-aminoFM2 from basified urine sample was extracted into the dispersed DCM droplets. The extracting organic phase was separated by centrifuging and the sedimented phase was transferred into a 300 microl vial insert and evaporated to dryness. The residue was reconstituted in 30 microl mobile phase (20:80, acetonitrile:water). An aliquot of 20 microl as injected into LC-ES-MS/MS. Various parameters affecting the extraction efficiency (type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, effect of alkali and salt) were evaluated. Under optimum conditions, precision, linearity (correlation coefficient, r(2)=0.988 over the concentration range of 0.05-2.5 ng/ml), detection limit (0.025 ng/ml) and enrichment factor (20) had been obtained. To our knowledge, DLLME was applied to urine sample for the first time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.12.021

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 93

Metadata

Authors
Melwanki, M. B., Chen, W.-S., Bai, H.-Y., Lin, T.-Y., & Fuh, M.-R.
Affiliations
Soochow University (TW)
Corresponding author
Fuh, Ming-Ren
Venue
Talanta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04-30
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
618-622
ISSN
0039-9140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060355758
Cited by
93
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Talanta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
7-aminoflunitrazepam, flunitrazepam, urinary biomarkers, hypnotics, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, LC-ESI-MS/MS, extraction efficiency optimization, urine drug testing
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Flunitrazepam, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review