Parabens determination in cosmetic and personal care products exploiting a multi-syringe chromatographic (MSC) system and chemiluminescent detection
Abstract
Parabens are widely used in dairy products, such as in cosmetics and personal care products. Thus, in this work a multi-syringe chromatographic (MSC) system is proposed for the first time for the determination of four parabens: methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), propylparaben (PP) and butylparaben (BP) in cosmetics and personal care products, as a simpler, practical, and low cost alternative to HPLC methods. Separation was achieved using a 5mm-long precolumn of reversed phase C18 and multi-isocratic separation, i.e. using two consecutive mobile phases, 12:88 acetonitrile:water and 28:72 acetonitrile:water. The use of a multi-syringe buret allowed the easy implementation of chemiluminescent (CL) detection after separation. The chemiluminescent detection is based on the reduction of Ce(IV) by p-hydroxybenzoic acid, product of the acid hydrolysis of parabens, to excite rhodamine 6G (Rho 6G) and measure the resulting light emission. Multivariate designs combined with the concepts of multiple response treatments and desirability functions have been employed to simultaneously optimize and evaluate the responses. The optimized method has proved to be sensitive and precise, obtaining limits of detection between 20 and 40 µg L(-1) and RSD <4.9% in all cases. The method was satisfactorily applied to cosmetics and personal care products, obtaining no significant differences at a confidence level of 95% comparing with the HPLC reference method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The measured values were in good agreement with those previously reported in the literature for similar samples.
“The measured values were in good agreement with those previously reported in the literature for similar samples [53,54].”
From Automated dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of the organic phase (2018) · cites this paper as [53]
Cites
Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours
Darbre, P. D., Aljarrah, A., Miller, W. R., Coldham, N. G., Sauer, M. J., & Pope, G. S. (2004) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.958 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automated dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on the solidification of the organic phase
Medina, D. A. V., Santos-Neto, Á. J., Cerdà, V., & Maya, F. (2018) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2018.06.081 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rodas, M., Portugal, L. A., Avivar, J., Estela, J. M., & Cerdà, V.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES)
- Venue
- Talanta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 254-262
- ISSN
- 0039-9140 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034001324
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Talanta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- MINECO (CTQ2013-47461-R)
- FEDER
- European Funds (PTQ-2012-05755)
- Carolina Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- parabens, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, butylparaben, cosmetics, personal care products, chemiluminescence detection, rhodamine 6G, cerium(IV) reduction, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, method optimization, desirability function, multi-response optimization
- MeSH terms
- Chromatography, Cosmetics, Environmental Pollutants, Luminescent Measurements, Parabens, Syringes, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review