Cited by 81Analytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Lab-In-Syringe Automation of Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Direct Immersion Single Drop Microextraction Coupled Online to High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Fluoroquinolones

Yıldırım, Sercan, Cocovi-Solberg, David J., Uslu, Bengi, Solich, Petr, Horstkotte, Burkhard·2022·Talanta

Abstract

Lab-In-Syringe direct immersion single drop microextraction is proposed as an automated sample pretreatment methodology and coupled online to HPLC with fluorescence detection for the determination of fluoroquinolones in environmental waters. For the first time, a drop of a natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES), synthesized from hexanoic acid and thymol, has been used as an extractant in automated single-drop microextraction. The extraction procedure was carried out within the 5 mL void of an automatic syringe pump. A 9-position head valve served the aspiration of all required solutions, air, waste disposal, and hyphenation with the HPLC instrument. Sample mixing during extraction was done by a magnetic stirring bar placed inside the syringe. Only 60 μL of NADES were required omitting toxic classical solvents and improving the greenness of the proposed methodology. By direct injection, linear working ranges between 0.1 and 5 μg L-1 were achieved for all fluoroquinolones. The limit of quantification values and enrichment factors ranged from 20 ng L-1 to 30 ng L-1 and 35 to 45, respectively. Accuracies obtained from the analysis of spiked surface water and wastewater treatment plant effluent analysis at two concentration levels (0.5 and 4 μg L-1) ranged from 84.6% to 119.7%, with RSD values typically <3%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123476

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Lab-in-Syringe automated DES-based direct immersion single-drop microextraction system coupled online with HPLC was developed for determination of fluoroquinolones in environmental waters, showing reduced solvent consumption and improved reproducibility.

    “For example, a Lab-in-Syringe automated DES-based direct immersion singledrop microextraction system coupled online with HPLC was developed for the determination of fluoroquinolones in environmental waters, showing reduced solvent consumption and improved reproducibility [122].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 81

Authors
Yıldırım, S., Cocovi-Solberg, D. J., Uslu, B., Solich, P., & Horstkotte, B.
Affiliations
  • Karadeniz Technical University (TR)
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • Ankara University (TR)
  • Charles University (CZ)
Corresponding author
Horstkotte, Burkhard
Venue
Talanta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
246
Pages
123476
ISSN
0039-9140 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223643386
Cited by
81
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Talanta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
single-drop microextraction, deep eutectic solvents, natural deep eutectic solvents, fluoroquinolones, environmental water analysis, wastewater treatment plant effluent, hexanoic acid, thymol, fluorescence detection
MeSH terms
Deep Eutectic Solvents, Automation, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Immersion, Solvents, Syringes, Fluoroquinolones, Limit of Detection, Liquid Phase Microextraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review