Getting recognised: Teachers negotiating professional identities as learners through talk
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Giving individuals opportunities to critically reflect on their own experiences, engaging them in reflective identity work or core reflection, offers possibilities for learning and revising their I-positions.
“Giving individuals opportunities to critically reflect on their own experiences, engaging them in reflective identity work (Cohen 2010) or core reflection (Korthagen 2004), offers possibilities for learning and revising their I-positions.”
From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Cohen 2010
Through reflective identity work and the process of experiencing, Anna externalised, and became aware of, conflicting motives underlying her activities, noticing that the contradictions affected her well-being at work.
“Through reflective identity work (Cohen 2010) and the process of experiencing (Sannino 2010), Anna externalised, and became aware of, conflicting motives underlying her activities, noticing that the contradictions affected her well-being at work.”
From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Cohen 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 46 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Cohen, J. L.
- Affiliations
- DePaul University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Jennifer L.
- Venue
- Teaching and Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 473-481
- ISSN
- 0742-051X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071777467
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 18.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- DePaul University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Keywords
- teacher identity, teacher as learner, identity negotiation, teacher discourse, discursive strategies, teacher knowledge production, teacher professional development, education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
