Cited by 71Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesAdult and Continuing Education TopicsOnline and Blended Learning

Dialogic understanding of teachers' online transformative learning: A qualitative case study of teacher discussions in a graduate-level online course

Lee, Kyungmee, Brett, Clare·2015·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narratives allowed student teachers to feel safe to reveal their genuine identities and make sense of becoming a teacher.

    “Also, narratives allowed student teachers to feel safe to reveal their genuine identities (Lee and Brett 2015) and make sense of becoming a teacher (Choi et al. 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K., & Brett, C.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Lee, Kyungmee
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
46
Pages
72-83
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965541145
Cited by
71
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6
FWCI
22.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
transformative learning, dialogism, Bakhtin, Mezirow, online teacher training, homography, educational technology adaptation, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review