Cited by 33Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesReflective Practices in EducationEvaluation of Teaching Practices
The DOI matches its Crossref record.
If you build it, will they reflect? Examining teachers' use of an online video-based learning website
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.004
Cites
Statistics
Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.
Verification
Claims the paper makes
We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The most practical videos within authentic classroom situations (Baran and Cagiltay 2010;Bates, Phalen, and Moran 2016;Beilstein et al. 2020;Theelen et al. 2020) promoted the highest levels of teacher reflection and knowledge development.”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Bates, Phalen, and Moran 2016
In the citing paper
“Within and outside these online communities, videos of real classrooms were outstanding tools to drive teacher reflection (Bates, Phalen, and Moran 2016;Beilstein et al. 2020), obtain practical knowledge about the profession (Baran and Cagiltay 2010;Liu 2012), and connect with course content in a practical way (Lenkaitis 2020).”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Bates, Phalen, and Moran 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Abramovich, 2012, Studying teacher selection of resources in an ultra-large scale interactive system: Does metadata guide the way?, Computers & Education, 58, 551, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.001 · DOI
- Ball, 1996, Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn, Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500
- Barab, 2001, Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum, Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 71, 10.1007/BF02504948 · DOI
- Barnhart, 2015, Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationships among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze, and respond to student thinking, Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83, 10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005 · DOI
- Bates, M. S., Moran, C. G., & Phalen, L. (in press). Supporting excellent teaching of content and practices with video clubs. Teaching Children Mathematics.
- Bates, 2016, Online professional development: A primer, Phi Delta Kappan, 97, 70, 10.1177/0031721716629662 · DOI
- Bates, 2016, Understanding teacher professional learning through cyber research
- Borba, 2012, Online mathematics teacher education: Overview of an emergent field of research, ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 697, 10.1007/s11858-012-0457-3 · DOI
- Borko, 2008, Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417, 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012 · DOI
- Borko, 2009, Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 3, 10.1177/0022487108328488 · DOI
- Chokshi, 2004, Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances, Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 520, 10.1177/003172170408500710 · DOI
- Chval, 2009, Videos and prospective teachers, Teaching Children Mathematics, 16, 98, 10.5951/TCM.16.2.0098 · DOI
- Dede, 2009, A research agenda for online teacher professional development, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 8, 10.1177/0022487108327554 · DOI
- Farooq, 2007, Sustaining a community computing infrastructure for online teacher professional development: A case study of designing Tapped In, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 397, 10.1007/s10606-007-9049-0 · DOI
- Fishman, 2013, Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation, Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 427, 10.1177/0022487113494413 · DOI
- Franke, 2001, Learning to teach mathematics: Focus on student thinking, Theory into Practice, 40, 102, 10.1207/s15430421tip4002_4 · DOI
- Kersting, 2010, Teachers' analysis of classroom video predicts student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge, Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 172, 10.1177/0022487109347875 · DOI
- Killion, 2013, Tapping technology's potential, Journal of Staff Development, 34, 10
- Moon, 2014, Beyond comparisons of online versus face-to-face PD: Commentary in response to Fishman et al., “Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation.”, Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 172, 10.1177/0022487113511497 · DOI
- Rich, 2009, Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 52, 10.1177/0022487108328486 · DOI
- Santagata, 2009, Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 38, 10.1177/0022487108328485 · DOI
- Sherin, 2009, Selecting video clips to promote mathematics teachers' discussion of student thinking, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 213, 10.1177/0022487109336967 · DOI
- Sherin, 2009, Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20, 10.1177/0022487108328155 · DOI
- Shulman, 1986, Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15, 4, 10.3102/0013189X015002004 · DOI · Paper page
- van Es, 2010, A framework for facilitating productive discussions in video clubs, Educational Technology, 50, 8
- van Es, 2014, A framework for the facilitation of teachers' analysis of video, Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 340, 10.1177/0022487114534266 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019
Metadata
- Authors
- Bates, M. S., Phalen, L., & Moran, C. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bates, Meg Schleppenbach
- Venue
- Teaching and Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 17-27
- ISSN
- 0742-051X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2344481768
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 269 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Teaching and Teacher Education (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1020083)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- online professional development, video-based learning, teacher reflection, web analytics, teacher learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
