Cited by 42Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and Coping

Self-compassion as key to stress resilience among first-year early childhood teachers during COVID-19: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

Chen, Jennifer J.·2022·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103627

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J. J.
Affiliations
Kean University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Jennifer J.
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
111
Pages
103627
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206016441
Cited by
42
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
self-compassion, stress resilience, early childhood educators, novice teachers, COVID-19 pandemic, teacher stress, stress coping, lived experience, self-kindness, social support, self-judgment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review