Cited by 9Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Assessment and ImprovementEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Data-driven decision making using local multi-source data: Analysis of a teacher-researcher’s professional practice

Open access
Villeneuve, André, Bouchamma, Yamina·2023·Teaching and Teacher Education

Abstract

We examined the professional practice of a teacher-researcher who introduced a pedagogical decision-making process using local multi-source data in a professional learning community. Through a written and thematic approach, the analysis revealed seven contributing elements related to the implementation process of a pedagogical decision-making practice: members' mobilisation around a common goal, acquisition of a common language, interpersonal relations skills, members' self-training, differentiated implementation, reflection, and the members’ paradoxical relationship with technological tools. Theoretical and practical outcomes are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104198

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villeneuve, A., & Bouchamma, Y.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Villeneuve, André
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
132
Pages
104198
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4379779763
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
data-driven decision making, teacher-researchers, professional learning communities, implementation process, professional development, reflection, technological tools, teacher professional practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review