Cited by 97Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

How policy can build the plug-in electric vehicle market: Insights from the REspondent-based Preference And Constraints (REPAC) model

Wolinetz, Michael, Axsen, Jonn·2017·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolinetz, M., & Axsen, J.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Axsen, Jonn
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
117
Pages
238-250
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561781992
Cited by
97
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • California Air Resources Board
  • Natural Resources Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
plug-in electric vehicles, vehicle purchase subsidies, transport policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review