The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industry 4.0 as policy-driven discourse to institutionalize innovation systems in manufacturing
Abstract
We are witnessing an increasing adoption of digital technologies in manufacturing industries around the globe. This trend is often debated under the label Industry 4.0. A key claim put forward in these debates is that Industry 4.0 represents a revolution that will reshape manufacturing industries akin to previous industrial revolutions. Despite the popularity of this claim, it provides little help to clarify the identity of Industry 4.0. Such a clarification is however much needed given the worldwide proliferation of digital technologies in manufacturing industries. I address this gap by arguing to view Industry 4.0 as policy-driven innovation discourse in manufacturing industries that aims to institutionalize innovation systems that encompass business, academia, and politics. This clarification of the identity of Industry 4.0 adds to a better understanding of the relationship between manufacturing and politics as well as technological change in manufacturing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
Cited by
The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance
Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 · Cited by 2,201
Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880 · Cited by 825
Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation
Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107735 · Cited by 508
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2867 · Cited by 462
Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Reischauer, G.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792463724
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
